IPad edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted after more than 3 months have passed with concerns remaining, plus there haven't been any "keep" votes since this GAR was opened. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 19:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am fulfilling a request to reevaluate this article made some months ago. There are two banner cleanup tags on the article; one warns that it "may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may interest only a particular audience". I agree: I think that the article has too many detailed tables in the Model Comparison section of the article. These do contain too much detail. It would be much more user-friendly to replace with text detailing the salient differences between models according to reviewers (and having too much detail can be a GA issue). Also, there is some non-cited text, which is an issue with verifiability criterion. (t · c) buidhe 06:27, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]