Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Forbidden City/1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: No improvement Real4jyy (talk) 05:27, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A 2007 GA that seems worse for the wear. It has various uncited claims, a general overabundance of images that creates sandwiching issues across much of the article. The history section is written in a summary style when it really doesn't have to be - it has plenty of room to grow. And some of the sourcing is to things such as travel guides or fun facts lists. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 16:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.