Wikipedia:Featured and good topic removal candidates/Nine Inch Nails/archive1

Nine Inch Nails edit

Nine Inch Nails

7 articles

Awards and nominations

Back in December, the Trent Reznor article was demoted from its GA status. 3 months later, there has been no act to bring it back to GA or higher. GamerPro64 (talk) 15:14, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, Nine Inch Nails also has several deadlinks in the article. Live performances has at least one. See the book report for details. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 19:59, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delist as featured topic. There are a large number of problems, not just with Trent Reznor. In fact, I'd almost suggest that Nine Inch Nails itself be delisted as a FA. It has a ton of dead links, some of which have been broken for almost two years. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 17:21, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The main article had nine dead links, I was able to fix five of then with 15 minutes work. I know nothing at all about this subject, but Reznor doesn't look impossible to fix. I'll give it a go rather than see an FT fall without a fight. Courcelles 18:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Alright. I'll place the review on hold for the time being. GamerPro64 (talk) 18:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Go ahead and delist this. It's so far out of my knowledge base I don't even know what I don't know... and that's making too much work for me when I have too much on my plate. I'll try to bring it back without time pressures if I can. Courcelles 09:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per the above. The issues with the article are too great to be fixed quickly. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 01:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with consensus to demote from FT status. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:53, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]