Age of Empires series edit

Main contributor: Giggy

Main contributor has 3 edits in more than 4 months. These are the main 3 games, as the other are just expansions. Nergaal (talk) 04:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - IMO you need to include all the other games. The expansions for one thing are considered part of the series proper - rst20xx (talk) 10:28, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - The lead of the main article states that there are seven titles and three spin-offs, so this is obviously not comprehensive. Skinny87 (talk) 13:26, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply - why shouldn't expansions be part of a subtopics on the individual games themselves? Nergaal (talk) 17:54, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Most simply, each game only has one expansion and two articles is not enough for a topic - rst20xx (talk) 15:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh sorry, III has 2 expansions, but at any rate, I feel that to subtopic here, when we are only dealing with 12 articles in total, is oversplitting - rst20xx (talk) 15:48, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - OK, you can leave Mythology and the DS games behind, but not the expansions - only one out of the four is GA, BTW. igordebraga 19:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - I don't think Age of Mythology needs to be considered, although I think the DS ones would (they are still branded Age of Empires). Either way this doesn't meet criteria. --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 18:19, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Close with no consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 13:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]