Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Rugby union
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a promoted featured portal candidate. Please do not modify it.
Portal:Rugby union edit
Self-nomination I believe that this portal meets all the featured portal criteria. It has lots of content and is updated often. The portal has undergone a peer review and all the issues were addressed. - Shudde talk 20:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Only two concerns. The heading introduction box's top isn't italicised like the others and there is no topic box. See Portal:North West England for an example of one. I'm sure once that is done, I'll support. — Rudget speak.work 15:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: as reviewer. Happy editing, [sd] 23:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. A couple things: Topics could be changed to Main Topics, and a small image/icon would be nice in that section, as well as in the "Things you can do", "Recent news", "Wikiprojects", and "Did you know" sections. I see you have some material on a selected schedule. Are there enough committed editors taking care of that, or would randomizing some more stuff reduce some of the workload? Cirt (talk) 11:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Could you please be more specific about the images/icons you are thinking of? Is there an example I can see? The only thing on a schedule is the selected article. It's only one article a month and I'm pretty sure that WikiProject Rugby union can handle that. - Shudde talk 02:58, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, see the Featured Portal, Portal:Sustainable development, for some examples of images and icons used to add flavor to certain sections. Cirt (talk) 04:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Could you please be more specific about the images/icons you are thinking of? Is there an example I can see? The only thing on a schedule is the selected article. It's only one article a month and I'm pretty sure that WikiProject Rugby union can handle that. - Shudde talk 02:58, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support (I've acted on a couple of suggestions here). --Bob (talk) 19:41, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Support - it looks excellent and these editors have been working very hard on this..--Cometstyles 02:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.