Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Brazil/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured portal candidate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the portal's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured portal candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The portal was promoted by User:Cirt 21:13, 17 January 2009 [1].

---

Portal:Brazil

previous FPOC

I'm nominating this portal for featured portal candidacy because I think it meets the criteria. I've been working on this for a while, revamping its complicated design, into a well designed portal, with a random portal component on everything. It has 20 selected articles, 17 selected pictures, 16 sets of 3 DYKs (48 in total), 20 selected biographies, in the news component, 17 selected quotes, and 10 panaromas along with categories, related wikiprojects, quality content, things you can do, topics, related portals and associated wikimedia sections. Sunderland06 (talk) 02:24, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

• Support: This meets all the FPo criteria, so there is no reason for it to not be promoted. Dendodge Talk^Contribs 15:21, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

  Actually, it needs credits for all the images (see Portal:The Beatles for examples). Consider my !vote oppose until that is fixed, when it will automagically change to support. Dendodge Talk^Contribs 22:50, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

  All images are now credited. Sunderland06 (talk) 04:22, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

  Great! Previous comment struck. Dendodge Talk^Contribs 00:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Comment

This portal is still up at WP:PPREV, with some unaddressed issues there. One of these two discussions needs to be closed before this can continue. Cirt (talk) 23:00, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Now removed from WP:PPREV. Sunderland06 (talk) 02:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Rotating intro images

This might be a nice idea to improve dynamism, see a model in use at WP:FPORTs, Portal:Iceland/Intro and Portal:Philosophy of science/Intro. Cirt (talk) 13:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Done, added six images. Sunderland06 (talk) 23:35, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Very nice! Cirt (talk) 13:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Comment by Jh12

• Saw this at peer review and it looks really good. The only thing I can see is that three of your box headers are in italics (Categories, Related WikiProjects, Associated Wikimedia). Please standardize all the headers to be one way or the other. --Jh12 (talk) 18:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC) Done cheers for the comment.

• Support. Beautiful. The only thing I could find to criticise is that there are a few redlinks in some of the descriptions. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:23, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.