Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Tabula Rogeriana

Tabula Rogeriana

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2022 at 21:07:37 (UTC)

Original – A 1929 copy with names translittered into Latin script of the 1154 Arabic Tabula Rogeriana, upside-down with north oriented up

Reason: rare old document, very high resolution, used on 12 articles or pages
Articles in which this image appears: Muhammad al-Idrisi, Portal:History of science, History of geography, Science in the medieval Islamic world, Muslim world, Map, Cartography, Arabs, Geography and cartography in medieval Islam, Siculo-Arabic, Islamic world contributions to Medieval Europe, Đại Việt
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Maps
Creator: Konrad Miller (1844-1933), uploaded by User:Skimel

Comment There is another version, much less used: File:Tabula Rogeriana 1929 copy by Konrad Miller.jpg
Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 21:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If the original wasn't North-up, I don't think we should rotate it just because. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 21:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – prefer un-rotated version [1]. Bammesk (talk) 00:38, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This it not the original map by Al-Idrisi, but a 20th century copy by Konrad Miller. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skimel (talk • contribs)
- I don't mind that entirely, though the original would have been preferred. Although that said... 1929? ...How is this out of copyright in the US? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 16:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We actually do have the original, but some assembly required, as well as a 19th century assembly of the map that keeps the Arabic labels. Also [2]. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 16:23, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Adam Cuerden thanks for the links, that's very interesting. This makes me wonder if the whole map has ever been done by Al-Idrisi, or if it is a modern recreation. Skimel (talk) 10:09, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Currently nominated for deletion on Commons. MER-C 10:38, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would greatly prefer one of the source documents (themselves copies, but at a step less removed) used by Miller. I think the latin captions and redrawing are likely to mislead readers about the content of the original. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:40, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]