Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Heisman Trophy winners/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was kept by Dabomb87 21:27, 21 July 2010 [1].
List of Heisman Trophy winners edit
List of Heisman Trophy winners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: WT:CFB, User talk:Avenged Eightfold
Due to continuous edit warring over the Reggie Bush Heisman Trophy, list appears to no longer meet criteria #6. Smashvilletalk 19:41, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I don't see the need to delist because of a small content dispute. Obamafan70's comment on the talk page is spot on, IMO. Make a note of it and move on. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment (edit conflict) I don't think I've ever seen a Featured item (article or list) lose its status because of edit-warring, and it does seem silly that its status should be imperilled over such a minor point in the grand scheme of things. I'm surprised nobody has sought page-protection to try and enforce a moratorium on editing by IPs (who seem to be carrying out the bulk of the edit-warring) until there is a consensus as to how to handle the situation. (And per Dabomb's comment on Obamafan70's wise suggestion). BencherliteTalk 19:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment While we're here I might as well say that the {{citation needed}} needs removing, and the shade of the red used for Reggie makes the line utterly unreadable. But I agree with the above. This lists's issues are small and could easily have been dealt with without the need for an FLRC. --WFC-- 19:58, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Issues resolved I have added a footnote that resolves the Reggie Bush situation for now, and removed the citation needed tag. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:29, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw. Entirely willing to withdraw here. Upon further review, we appear to have some good editors watching the page to keep it in check. --Smashvilletalk 21:20, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I must say that I am impressed at the quick fix of this article. Thanks to all who help resolved this issue before I even got the chance to check it out. A8x (talk) 00:09, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.