Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Flag flying days in Mexico/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was removed by User:Sephiroth BCR 23:52, 10 January 2009 [1].

Flag flying days in Mexico edit

Notified: Zscout370, WP:MEXICO, WP:HERALD.

Fails featured list criteria: 1, 2, 3.

The article's lead is way too short and not even comprehensive, barely has any style, structure, and visual appeal, and the article haven't been edited only twice in the past year. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 21:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How does it fail the "structure" part of the requirements. The list is structured in a way to show when the flag is flown at full staff and when the flag is flown at half-staff. As for the events, do you want us to have a brief statement on what each event is about? User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 22:00, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, it doesn't fail criteria #4. As for the rest, you could talk more about the flag flying days in Mexico, the Law on the National Arms, Flag, and Anthem, and any other additional information. Also, the prose has to be cited, and you have to tell the readers which references cite to which. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 22:41, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That can be arranged. I mentioned the article number in the lead section, so it gives some point of reference I can expand about the law. All I need is just time to work on it, since I got university finals this coming week. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 22:53, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just in case you didn't know, the FLRC nomination period is 14 days, which is plenty of time to fix the article up. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 23:03, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Consider it done. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 23:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I expanded the lead a bit. I also fixed one of the dead links. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 23:35, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment
    • Move "Overview" in the first table to the notes
    • The lead still has no references and is still too short
    • Maybe include a list of former flag days

—Chris! ct 02:18, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • The lead is supposed to have references? Ok, consider it done. As for the length, how far it should go? I mentioned about the rules, half-staffing, etc. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 07:20, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, and almost 99% of featured lists have around 2 to 3 paragraphs, so yeah...2 to 3 paragraphs would be good. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 08:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I guess the standards have changed a lot since I last did these lists about 2 years ago. I'll try my hand at it, but I am not certain what I can say about this topic, in the lead section, that will span two paragraphs. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 08:10, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you should talk about some notable flag days listed and why they are important.—Chris! ct 06:47, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As a US National, I am not certain what days are notable or not. That is something, I think, someone from Mexico should answer. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 07:45, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delist from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) I will change to "Delist" if action to address these comments are not taken within three days, we are already past the two-week threshold.

  • The lead is better, but it is not quite there yet. Provide more background on the flag itself and its creation. Maybe explain its appearance?
  • Web citations should have titles, URLs, publishers/works and last access dates.
  • "One such case was that 1 November was declared a holiday to hoist the national flag in 1991"-->In one such case, 1 November was declared a holiday to hoist the national flag in 1991 So was the holiday solely meant for the raising of the national flag?
  • There should be no spaces between text/punctuation and inline citations.
  • The lead needs inline citations.
  • In the main table, instead of having the "Overview" column and that horrible whitespace, can we turn those two items into footnotes?
  • "The Mexican flag will be flown at full staff on the following days" Use the present tense, sounds like these flag-flying days haven't been enacted yet. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Go ahead and delist it. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 05:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Changed to "Delist", no point of keeping this here if nobody works on it. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • I can't work on this alone, almost everything needs some support/verification from someone down there and they are not helping me out. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 16:53, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • I understand, it is better to delist and work on it at your own pace than try to make hurried changes to meet the deadline. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_removal_candidates/Flag_flying_days_in_Mexico/archive1&oldid=1143874458"