Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Pakistan national cricket team record by opponent/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 10:01, 14 October 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Pakistan national cricket team record by opponent edit

Featured list candidates/Pakistan national cricket team record by opponent/archive1

Nominator(s): Zia Khan 11:30, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After a black day for Pakistan cricket, now they have 105 lost to their name in Test cricket. But no worries, they have defeated others 116 times in the same format. In ODIs Pakistan have a reasonable result in term of winning percentage. Pakistan have won more matches than any other team. This list comprise Pakistan's record against the other teams in the three formats.The list is ready to go for a FL status becuse, in my opinion, meets the standards. Comments/suggestions appreciated, as always! Zia Khan 11:30, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quick comment

~~Lead is of just three lines, fails WP:LEAD. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 14:35, 15 September 2013 (UTC)~~[reply]

Have a look now! Zia Khan 17:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comments

~~In the same series, Pakistan recorded their first Test win against the same team. same team redundant~~

Link England, Australia, New Zealand in the lead

As of technique should be used to quote stats in the lead instead on FN.

~~—Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 11:42, 4 October 2013 (UTC)~~[reply]

Done. Zia Khan 16:19, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support – I've made some copy-edits. Be sure to check —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 11:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support! Zia Khan 23:05, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Crisco 1492 (talk)

*Comments from Crisco

inning - Everyone tells me the singular of innings in cricket is innings.

You're right. Zia Khan 01:02, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They have played 71 T20I matches and won 44 of them; 25 were lost and two being tied. - Why the switch from the active to passive voice?

Chek this now. Zia Khan 01:02, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Second sentence is still passive. Should be active.

Couldn't find out. Which sentence do you mean? Zia Khan 23:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Was thinking something like this. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:30, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aah! I was looking for the second sentence of the both paragraphs. That's fine! Zia Khan 23:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps make it clear that the records are records at the end

Added a note. Zia Khan

Check my copyedit. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:19, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments! Zia Khan 01:02, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support on prose. Looks solid. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:28, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a million! Zia Khan 16:59, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – "Innings" shouldn't be capitalized in the second sentence. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:19, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decapitalized. Zia Khan 01:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support I cannot find any problem in this one. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 16:24, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! Zia Khan 16:59, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.