Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of municipalities in Guadalajara/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Contents
List of municipalities in Guadalajara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
We are trying to bring up the list of municipalities of Spanish provinces up to the standard seen in the other featured lists of municipalities. Alavense has made an excellent template based on our last nomination and we have incorporated those changes into this nomination. Should go smoothly but we are happy to make any recommended changes. Thanks for all your comments in advance! Mattximus (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
edit- MPGuy2824
- "Municipalities enjoy a large degree of autonomy" The sentence before this is about the province. It think you should move this to the second paragraph and add a sentence or two about the province in the first paragraph.
- While that it's true, I think we also have to bear in mind that this list is about the municipalities in that given province, so it makes sense, in my opinion, that most of the information is about said municipalities. In any case, I would like to have Mattximus's opinion on this. Alavense (talk) 08:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The first sentence introduces both the province and the municipalities. Then the following sentences maintains this order talking about the provinces then the municipalities. I do like how this flows, and you can read the first paragraph and get the article right away. Mattximus (talk) 17:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- "One concejal is added for every additional 100,000 inhabitants, with a further one added when the number of concejales based on this methodology would be even in order to prevent tied votes." This sentence isn't needed given that the most-populated municipality has less than 100,000 inhabitants.
- Done. Alavense (talk) 07:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Torremochuela has 6 residents, three of whom are councillors. - Sorry, no comment here. I just thought is was funny.
- It had up to 225 inhabitants in the 1950s. It's one of the best examples of what's called the "emptied Spain". Alavense (talk) 07:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- "Cabanillas del Campo is the province of Guadalajara's fourth largest municipality by population." it should be fifth-largest.
- Solved. Alavense (talk) 07:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Quite a few refs are missing archive links. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I tried to run the bot, but, given that some of the refs have permalinks that lead to selections of information, that didn't work out. So I went ahead and archived as many as I could myself. Alavense (talk) 07:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you very much for your comments, MPGuy2824. I've addressed as many as I could. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 07:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Pinging MPGuy2824 to see if there's anything else we can do. Alavense (talk) 14:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support promotion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
edit- "Elections in municipalities with more than 250 inhabitans" - last word is spelt incorrectly
- Fixed. Good catch! Mattximus (talk) 17:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- That's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:38, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source and image review from Averageuntitleduser
editMinor, nitpicky stuff for the images.
- Optionally, the the alt texts of the first two maps could be changed to "refer to caption".
- I'm not really strong willed on this one but would prefer to keep as is to maintain consistency with the other 50 or so featured municipality lists.
- Optionally, the Guadalajara image could be replaced with Guadalajara-aire (retocada); a little closer and does not contain the plane.
- Unfortunately this image is much lower resolution and the buildings appear blurry, but you're right it's a better frame. However I would take clear image with a plane over blurry image without.
- Suggest changing the Azuqueca de Henares alt text to "Monument in front of buildings in Azuqueca de Henares".
- Done. Mattximus (talk) 20:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All sources are from governmental organizations and appear reliable. Checked sources 1, 3, 9, and 11, and they all pass or build on basic facts sourced elsewhere. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 00:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- All done Averageuntitleduser, thanks for your review! Mattximus (talk) 20:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with your reasoning for the first two points. Oh, and source formatting looks good too. Support. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 20:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.