Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Jake Gyllenhaal/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of awards and nominations received by Jake Gyllenhaal edit
List of awards and nominations received by Jake Gyllenhaal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
This is a list of awards and nominations received by American actor and producer Jake Gyllenhaal. I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the FL criteria after I spent the last few days expanding and sourcing it. This is my first FLC — I will address all comments to the best of my ability! Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 00:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I had a really good try but couldn't find anything to pick up on. Great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:06, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Could not find one mistake, not even with grammar or WP:MOS; this is basically a perfectly crafted list, impressive work! Wretchskull (talk) 07:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with ChrisTheDude and Wretchskull; this is a really good list! One quick question: is there a reason you didn't include every award in the infobox? RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @RunningTiger123: Thank you! My primary concern was mobile viewers, for whom the infobox table is automatically expanded with no option to collapse it. Basically they'll read the first paragraph of the lead and then have to scroll through the giant table of numbers before getting to the rest of the lead and the actual list. I thought including the major awards was a good compromise, though I've seen it done various ways in similar featured lists so happy to adjust anything if people suggest otherwise. DanCherek (talk) 04:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Sounds good! It's not what I do, but I understand the logic and see no reason to oppose the nomination over it. RunningTiger123 (talk) 16:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – RunningTiger123 (talk) 16:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review – All of the references appear reliable and well-formatted, and the link-checker tool shows no issues. Everything checks out okay. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:37, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Support on prose. I got nothing... Eddie891 Talk Work 15:48, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:14, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.