Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Brooklyn Nine-Nine/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was unsuccessful by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Brooklyn Nine-Nine

Nominator(s): Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 23:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because it passes the FL-criteria in my eyes and because I have tried my best to make it similar to other articles that have actually passed the criteria to become featured lists. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 23:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Per FL nomination guidelines, Nominators should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed. With your recent FL nomination starting just three days ago, I would suggest you close this nomination until the other nomination has been promoted or failed. RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:59, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: I just noticed a third FL nomination from just over a week ago. You should really wait on this nomination to ensure that other nominations can be reviewed and addressed properly. RunningTiger123 (talk) 05:05, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse closure/withdrawal - Some Dude From North Carolina opening the second nomination was OK as the first had multiple supports, but opening a third just three days later while both the other two are still open is not really appropriate..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Come on. The Clint Eastwood article already has two supports and is about to receive a source review, so that's basically three. The Better Call Saul list and this list are essentially the same thing, and I believe I can do both (I constantly spend my time refreshing both pages to make sure I'm up to date with new suggestions and so I can address problems as they come up). Please, don't close this nomination. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 13:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I don't think we should make an exception to this rule. I'm not saying you couldn't keep up, but the rules are in place for everyone for a reason; allowing this nomination to continue sets a bad precedent and could lead to other users nominating multiple lists while not being able to devote time to the nominations. Second, it's somewhat a matter of fairness for everyone. If you flood the FLC page with a bunch of new nominations, other nominations will be pushed down and receive less attention, which isn't fair to the users who worked on those lists and are waiting patiently to have their work reviewed. RunningTiger123 (talk) 17:07, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've always heard that no one is allowed 3 nominations at once. - Dank (push to talk) 05:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I also endorse closure. This is pushing it a little bit. ~ HAL333 00:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been unsuccessful, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.