Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of accolades received by Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 edit

Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2/archive1

Nominator(s): Chompy Ace 00:07, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After List of accolades received by Avengers: Endgame was promoted to featured list and appeared on the Main Page on January 18, 2021, I will do the same as this page. It is the another send-off to any franchise/series I wish to appear in the Main Page also. Chompy Ace 00:07, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

"It went on to win two awards, including Best Sound and Best Makeup." - you can't say "it won N awards, including...." and then list all N. "Including" by definition indicates that what follows isn't the entire list -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisTheDude, done. Chompy Ace 21:05, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude: Are you there? Chompy Ace 10:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am now (briefly).....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:40, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude: Yes. What about now? Chompy Ace 13:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:52, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dank edit

Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
Checking the FLC criteria:
1. I've skimmed the prose and made minor edits; nothing big jumps out at me. Feel free to revert or discuss. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the table.
2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
4. It is navigable.
5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the one image seems fine.
6. It is stable.
Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 13:44, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by RunningTiger123 edit

I would either exclude the AFI Award or add the comparable award from the National Board of Review recognizing the entire franchise (for consistency).
"Best Art Direction for a Fantasy Film" should capitalize "Film"
As best as I can tell, the Critics' Choice Awards for makeup and visual effects did not nominate specific individuals.
"Room of Requirement" should not capitalize "of"
"The Ultimate Scream" should sort by "Ultimate"

— RunningTiger123 (talk) 22:46, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RunningTiger123, done. Chompy Ace 08:10, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support – RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:50, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source review – The references are reliable and well-formatted across the board, and no dead links were found by the link-checker tool. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I can't find any new problems with the list. Great job.

--Birdienest81talk 11:42, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.