Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Georgia (country)/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of World Heritage Sites in Georgia (country) edit

List of World Heritage Sites in Georgia (country) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Tone 08:44, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are four World Heritage Sites in Georgia and 14 on the tentative list. Medieval churches and monasteries (get ready for many church photos in this list), spectacular mountain villages, as well as prehistoric sites and nature. Standard formatting. The list for Azerbaijan is seeing decent support already so I am comfortable in adding this nomination. Tone 08:44, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image review edit

  • File:Homo Georgicus IMG 2921.JPG – Licencing claims that "This is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art", but the object isn't "two-dimensional". Also, why is the underlying work is public domain in the United States?
  • File:Vani boar diadem (detail).JPG – I am not sure about this one, so feel free to get a second opinion, but what is the copyright status of the underlying work?

– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh: As for the skull, there are some alternatives, such as File:Homo georgicus-MGL 95212-P5030043-white.jpg, which has another licence, what about this one? As for the diadem, this is a photo from a museum of an artefact whose author has been dead for centuries, so I suppose this is fine? --Tone 10:14, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That is, better! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 11:44, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Replaced. --Tone 14:28, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pass for image review. An image review or any comments for my nomination would be appreciated. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:14, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • "Georgia has four sites on the list and a further 14 on the tentative list." - these should either both be written as numbers or both as words
  • "then delisted as a World Herigate Site" - spelling error
  • "the most recent site listed were the" => "the most recent site listed was the" (site is singular)
  • "In 2010–2017, it was listed as endangered" +> "Between 2010 and 2017, it was listed as endangered"
  • "which had both defensive and residential function" => "which had both defensive and residential functions"
  • "With the height of 50 metres" => "With a height of 50 metres"
  • "The vernacular architectural of the region" - pretty sure that should be "The vernacular architecture", but what actually is "vernacular architecture"?
  • "Shatili is a mountain village at the elevation" => "Shatili is a mountain village at an elevation"
  • "with buildings serving both in residential and defence function" => "with buildings serving both residential and defence functions"
  • Don't think "late antiquity" should have a capital L
  • That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • @ChrisTheDude: Fixed, thank you! Vernacular architecture refers to the ways people build without professional guidance. I'd link it but somehow I feel it would be confusing to the reader. In this context, I guess it can be seen as "not-church or not-castle". --Tone 08:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • I don't think it would hurt to link it if we have an article specifically on it....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        • On a second thought, I agree. Linked. --Tone 09:11, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:22, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by RunningTiger123 edit

— RunningTiger123 (talk) 16:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support – RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:14, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Read through the list and could not find any major issues standing out. Note I have made an minor edit to the article for general formatting. MWright96 (talk) 10:07, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source review — Pass edit

  • As with the other lists in this series, use of UNESCO for UNESCO lists is accepted. All the dates are consistently written. The link checker tool detects that all the URLs are working. So, it is a pass for consistency and reliability.
Spot checks
  • Ref#1 — Broadly OK
  • Ref#5 — "examples of medieval religious architecture in the Caucasus." — this is exactly same as the source. There should be some way to prevent that level of similarity.
  • Ref#8 — OK
  • Ref#15 — OK

– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Kavyansh.Singh: Reworded the Mtskheta text. By the way, are you doing manual check of using some kind of tool? (if the latter, let me know so I can use it as well) --Tone 10:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • @Tone – I'd say it is a pass for the source review. And I am doing it manually. There is Earwig's Copyvio detector, which is a great tool for various things, but is not very helpful for spot-checks. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:45, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_World_Heritage_Sites_in_Georgia_(country)/archive1&oldid=1067533963"