Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of National Lacrosse Hall of Fame members/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 15:57, 6 July 2010 [1].
List of National Lacrosse Hall of Fame members (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Yarnalgo talk to me 19:30, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because... it is a complete list of all the inductees and I believe it meets the criteria. Yarnalgo talk to me 19:30, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As a list of notable people shd not be a collection of redlinks. Sandman888 (talk) 10:00, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Per the use of a non-free image which doesn't seem to meet criteria 8:
- "Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." I hardly see that fulfilled.
- Your right, removed. --Yarnalgo talk to me 18:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Lead cd go into greater detail on the selection proces.
- Done. I've tried to add more to the lead. --Yarnalgo talk to me 18:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Could not this be merged with Lacrosse Museum and National Hall of Fame ?
- Per WP:SALAT, a list of people who are all notable themselves is an appropriate topic for a stand-alone list. --Yarnalgo talk to me 18:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The selection proces, it's not great prose but too list-like. Cd you do something? Sandman888 (talk) 21:56, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
Nomination and induction process: "and return ballot to the Nomination Committees." Missing "the" after "return"?
- Done. --Yarnalgo talk to me 18:09, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In the table headings, de-capitalize Affiliation in both.
- Done. --Yarnalgo talk to me 18:09, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- There are a lot of red links among the inductees. There is a "minimal proportion" of redlinks requirement in the FL criteria. I'm not a big fan of that criterion personally, but have my doubts as to whether the list meets it at the moment. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 17:11, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure what can be easily done about this (besides creating a couple hundred articles right now) because they should all be linked because they have all "received a well-known and significant award or honor" which makes them all notable per WP:ANYBIO. I actually was planning on creating the articles for each member after this nomination is over. --Yarnalgo talk to me 18:09, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose for now. Aside from Giants' concern, I don't like the sorting currently. Use template:sortname to make it so there written out normally, yet can be sorted alphabetically. I'll do a full review upon completion of that. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:20, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.