Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles of 2013/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by SchroCat 10:37, 3 July 2014 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles of 2013 edit

List of Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles of 2013 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Simon (talk) 07:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because... I think this list is appropriate for being a featured list. Simon (talk) 07:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's not a fork because this has much more information and highlights about number-one singles only in 2013, while the list of 2010s does not include this. Also I have added several third-party sources — Simon (talk) 05:06, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • "A content fork is the creation of multiple separate articles all treating the same subject" - the subject being Hot 100 number-one singles, so the decade and individual year lists will always be content forks of each other. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:50, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment (having stumbled here from my FLC discussion page). The list page is indeed meticulously cited, nice job so far by HĐ, however as to the quality of the sources themselves, I think it likely that third-party-sources exist for this info. Are the current sources satisfactory for WP:RS and WP:V? Yes. But still it could only help to improve the page further to buttress those with additional third-party-sources, as well. As far as the existence of the list page itself in relation to List of Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles of the 2010s, as mentioned above by Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, I think I'd like to hear from additional editors about that element, before weighing in further on that issue. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 12:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from WikiRedactor
  • I agree that it would be nice to more sources outside of Billboard; I see they're are some that are from other websites, but I'd like to see more.
    • I have currently provided more third party sources, and there are now four — Simon (talk) 02:27, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would also like to see the dates written out in the citations, as opposed to the current number abbreviations in the article.
    • Per MOS:DATEUNIFY, dates can be formatted as YYYY-MM-DD and there's nothing wrong with that — Simon (talk) 13:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please add Prometheus Global Media as the publisher for all of the Billboard sources (same with Hearst Corporation for Digital Spy.) WikiRedactor (talk) 22:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • The publishers are not really necessary here and are repetitive. Nothing wrong with that — Simon (talk) 02:27, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • Not a problem (since some of my suggestions appeared to be just personal preferences), and the content is all in order, so I will support this nomination. WikiRedactor (talk) 20:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_Billboard_Hot_100_number-one_singles_of_2013/archive1&oldid=1138481325"