Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of 250cc Motorcycle World Champions/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 17:52, 18 August 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): NapHit (talk) 20:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that list meets all the criteria necessary, after some hard work NapHit (talk) 20:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
--Crzycheetah 03:36, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support It's definitely a good list.--Crzycheetah 03:38, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- support fulfills the FL criteria a very good article. 02blythed (talk) 22:31, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
Change comma after "250cc is the intermediate category" to a semi-colon.Period missing before Bruno Ruffo.Giants2008 (17–14) 01:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- All done NapHit (talk) 18:31, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – My comments have been addressed, and the list was very clean to begin with. Giants2008 (17–14) 21:13, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. I'd still prefer if the constructor's flags were removed, but can understand why you put them there. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:45, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:56, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note FLC is currently short of reviewers; please consider reviewing one or more on the nomination list if you have not already (this message is being posted to all running FLCs). Dabomb87 (talk) 23:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments The point system mentioned at the prose is the current point system. I believe that in the older years the point system were different. According to Alex Barros article, there were 3 different point systems. However I haven't had time to confirm this and find a reference, but I think it should be noted that the point systems weren't always the same. — Martin tamb (talk) 06:23, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.