Wikipedia:Featured article review/Sunderland A.F.C./archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 2:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: Sunderland06,
Maxim.il89(blocked), Eem dik doun in toene, WikiProject Football, WikiProject North East England, 2021-03-21, 2022-06-24
Review section
editI am nominating this featured article for review because there is uncited text, short paragraphs, and MOS:SANDWICH throughout the article. The sources should also be reviewed as "Roker Report" and a wordpress website are used as sources, and some sources are not complete (missing author name, publisher, etc.) Z1720 (talk) 04:19, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, needed work has not occurred. Hog Farm Talk 19:11, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, considerable uncited text, improvements not happening. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:29, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
edit- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and organization. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist no progress on substantive issues. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:54, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist issues are still outstanding. Hog Farm Talk 01:42, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist no progress on issues, Z1720 (talk) 13:43, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.