Wikipedia:Featured article review/Microsoft/archive2
The Criticism section has three tags about verification, and it is not comprehensive enough. I don't think we need that short section about Microsoft.com. If we need this section, then it's too short and not comprehensive enough. In a previous FAR, someone said that a few of the sources were not reliable enough. No one responded to his concerns. --Kaypoh 12:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Have you posted your concerns on the talk page and attempted to resolve them with other editors? The previous FAR closed only a few months ago; IMO, this FAR is premature and should be removed. And yes, someone did respond to my earlier concerns. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC)