- Article is still a Featured article.
One single reference; no inline references. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 22:44, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Remove, inadequately referenced. Christopher Parham (talk) 06:40, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- Remove, inadequately referenced. Skinnyweed 19:57, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Provisionalkeep, I like this article and will provide some references and minor reorganization soon. Opabinia regalis 21:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Finished; extensively referenced now. That required more of a rewrite than I originally planned but I think it's more focused now. I did raise the question of the references for the pathways on the talk page, but it looks like the original creator/s have moved on. Opabinia regalis 06:19, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- As the article now features inline citations, the nominator's criticism no longer applies; perhaps (s)he would like to have another look at the article and outline any other specific criticisms. User:The Disco King (not signed in) 204.40.1.129 14:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Rationale for FARC no longer applies.PDXblazers 00:43, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- See my comments on the article's talk. Thanks. Samsara (talk • contribs) 17:51, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Remove Josen 01:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Withdraw nomination as Opabinia regalis has reworked the article extensively, and it looks like we can turn it around. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 09:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Remove despite recent changes,
- The reference system is not set up correctly (number in text do not match with those in the reference list)
- The lead is overly technical,
- Lots of discussion of telomeres - without explaining what they are
- Many parts of the article that discuss primary research still have no references
- The language and grammar are really bad in places.
--Peta 02:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- Voting on a withdrawn nomination aside, further discussion and specific criticisms are invited on the article's talk page. You are right that the references are unwieldy; I've converted them with refconverter. There is, of course, elaboration on the nature of telomeres on the linked telomere page, but an appositive has also been added with a brief description. Opabinia regalis 05:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep- Their seems to be a lot of good work being done. Give it a chance. I will also try and work on some issues next week. --Blacksun 04:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Peta, can you give examples of what you're talking about? specifically:
- do you still find the lead overly technical?
- primary research - give examples so that references can be sought
- poor language/grammar - pls give examples
--prometheus1 08:42, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- seeing as it appears that there are no more objections, can the "featured article removal" flag be removed from the article?