Wikipedia:Featured article review/Conatus/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 0:29, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [1].
Conatus edit
- Notified: Lacatosias, Zbxgscqf, WikiProject Systems, WikiProject Psychology, WikiProject Philosophy, 2022-09-27
Review section edit
I am nominating this featured article for review because of issues I've discovered with WP:OR along with factual errors in the article prior to my edits in September, where it appeared that a variety of WP:SYNTH inferences were made to connect Spinoza's concept to a variety of similar looking ideas throughout Greek, Roman, and Arabic philosophy. I believe I removed most of the original research at this point, but the article itself is fairly short and I'm not convinced it's comprehensive now that it's been trimmed of all of those unjustified inclusions. - car chasm (talk) 03:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Carchasm I have fixed (above) the talk page notification from September. Please read the instructions at WP:FAR and complete the rest of the notifications. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry about that, I believe I misunderstood the instructions; After re-reading I've now notified the nominator, other principal contributors (other than myself) and the three wikiprojects whose templates are on the page. Please let me know if there is anything else I missed! - car chasm (talk) 14:59, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks good now, thanks! (No need to apologize; I just like to make sure first-time FAR nominators learn the ropes :) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Carchasm have any of your concerns been addressed? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- As far as the article is concerned, not at all - It appears I'm still the last person to make any significant edits to the page at all; it doesn't look like either of the major contributors notified above are still active. - car chasm (talk) 17:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry about that, I believe I misunderstood the instructions; After re-reading I've now notified the nominator, other principal contributors (other than myself) and the three wikiprojects whose templates are on the page. Please let me know if there is anything else I missed! - car chasm (talk) 14:59, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC I doubt the article is comprehensive, especially since several sources listed as references are not cited. (t · c) buidhe 20:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, issues unaddressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section edit
- Issues raised in the review section include original research and comprehensiveness. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:08, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. Now less than half the size of the promoted version; comprehensiveness concerns. DrKay (talk) 15:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist Comprehensive concerns, per DrKay above. Z1720 (talk) 02:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, issues unaddressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:29, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.