Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Zong massacre/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted by Ian Rose 10:01, 27 April 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Zong massacre edit
Zong massacre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
This is a comprehensive and detailed article. It is based on a number of reliable sources. I think it's well-written and interesting. This is my first FA nomination. Celuici (talk) 20:15, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'll post a review of this article over the weekend. Nick-D (talk) 10:48, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I've ended up with a lot less spare time than I thought I'd have and won't be able to review this article. For what it's worth, it looks in very good shape. Nick-D (talk) 10:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Image review
- File:Slave-ship.jpg: can we be more specific on source/photographer? Nikkimaria (talk) 14:12, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I've updated the source -- the image is identical to the one on the Boston Museum of Fine Arts's website. Celuici (talk) 15:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Addressed comments from Crisco 1492 moved to talk
- Support on prose, per my review at the talk page. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:22, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support on prose per standard disclaimer. These are my edits. - Dank (push to talk) 11:51, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. In addition to the prose as noted above, high-quality overall and quite thorough. I like the structural formatting and the referencing is meticulous. Excellent efforts on this quality improvement project for an article of such vital value for readers and editors alike. High encyclopedic value. High educational value. — Cirt (talk) 22:07, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delegate comments -- Hi Celuici, a belated welcome to FAC on behalf of the delegates. I usually like to see a spotcheck of sources for new nominees' work but I note that one was performed at GAN. I've also inspected the citations/references and they look fine. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:17, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Ian Rose (talk) 06:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.