Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/William Andrews Clark Memorial Library/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 03:52, 21 April 2007.
I think this should be a featured article because it fits the featured article criteria, it's unique and interesting. Destitute 19:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Object I feel the article is too unsourced. It lacks in references (there are only two). Evilclown93 19:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per above, not nearly enough inline citations to allow for indepth verifiability. Check main page article for an example of inline citation style for featured articles.-- Zleitzen(talk) 22:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Object The article doesn't appear comprehensive, and its history jumps from the early twentieth century to 2006; surely something has happened since then. It is also largely unreferenced and its unfree image has no fair use rationale. ShadowHalo 22:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Move the logo out of the lead. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Lack of references, and please do move that logo. Aaron Bowen 10:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.