Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Cure/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 00:43, 23 July 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]
The Cure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Lachlan Foley (talk) 08:11, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured article because I believe it satisfies the featured article criteria. Lachlan Foley (talk) 08:11, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delegate's comment - I cannot see much hope for this candidate's promotion when there are so many sections and statements that are not supported by inline citations to reliable sources. Graham Colm (talk) 21:15, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and suggest withdrawal - In addition to a general lack of citations (as pointed out by Graham), some of the citations used are missing information (for example, offline sources should include page numbers) or are misformatted (for example, FN55). There are also problems with adherence to WP:MOS (for example, long quotes should be blockquoted) and media policy (for example, File:TheCureLovesong.ogg is likely more than 10% of a non-free media). Nikkimaria (talk) 15:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Graham Colm (talk) 18:30, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.