Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Siege of Kehl (1796–97)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 11:39, 21 February 2015 (UTC) [1].[reply]
- Nominator(s): auntieruth (talk) 19:14, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This article is about the Siege of Kehl from 1796–1797. This siege, which the Austrians concluded successfully, ended the Rhine Campaign of 1796, part of the War of the First Coalition. The article has been through GA and A class review in the Military History Project. It seems to meet all the criterion and I would appreciate your comments. I forgot to say, also, that I've included the alt text; as of today, all the links are good; there is one dab link to the dab page for the other battles at same location. And as of today also there were no dupes. auntieruth (talk) 19:14, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Image review
- File:Rhein-Karte.png: what is the source of the data represented by this map? Nikkimaria (talk) 17:20, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't understand the question. What is the source the artist used to make the map? IDK. But I have compared it to other maps of the Rhine and it matches them. Do you want those sources? auntieruth (talk) 15:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Closing comment -- not sure why this hasn't attracted more commentary, especially after its successful MilHist ACR, but it's plainly not going anywhere. Given the dearth of feedback, Ruth, feel free to re-nom before the usual two-week waiting period. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 11:37, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Ian Rose (talk) 11:39, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.