Oppose. Love the book, but this article is completely unreferenced. No article can pass FAC without references. — Brian (talk) 01:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, I wouldn't even bother bringing this to peer review unless you have some references... then you can peer review then you can try FAC. grenグレン 07:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—completely unreferenced (1c). — Deckiller 10:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above; miserably fails 1c and lacks a sufficient lead. -Phoenix 21:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.