Self-nomination. I'm pretty proud of the work I've done (and will continue to do) on this article, and quite frankly I'm curious to see what other opinions of the piece will be. Hence my seeking out more objective opinions. ;) Cjmarsicano07:36, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Object - Too many subheadings. Too many short paragraphs, some sections read like a list, especially the Illness and Recovery section. Try and make the prose flow more. And Illness and Recovery is a totally misleading section title. - Hahnchen16:49, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Object. Too many subheadings, too many short sentences/paragraphs. Too many links to non-existant articles, and a very messy Discography section. There's a lot of work to be done, refer to WP:Peer review. — Wackymacs22:23, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant oppose. Good article, but it needs a good proofreading and cleaning up. It's close, but not quite there. And, as I've said on other FAC's, the references are inadequate. PedanticallySpeaking16:59, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
