Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/OverlordQBot 2
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: OverlordQ
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic (Semi-Supervised)
Programming Language(s): Perl
Function Summary: Replacement for MartinBotIV for resetting text on Wikipedia:Sandbox, Wikipedia:Introduction, or other pages which need regularly reset.
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Continuous
Edit rate requested: 1 edits per minute
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N
Function Details:
- Reset Wikipedia:Sandbox every 6 hours or immediately if header is vandalized.
- Reset Wikipedia:Introduction every 30 minutes or immediately if header is vandalized.
In order for the bot to classify replacement, one of the following conditions must be met:
- The edit changes the text of the introduction header
- Text is added before the introduction header
- The hard reset delay is reached.
Discussion
editI noticed that Seedbot was doing resets for the sandbox, but for the life of me, couldn't find that task mentioned in either of the two BRFA, which is why I'm submitting my own BRFA. Q T C 22:38, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedily Approved. Would you mind publishing your code? --ST47Talk·Desk 22:40, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Can do, just need to clean up some debugging stuff out of it. Q T C 01:51, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- On a side note on the Approved log it mentions it already has the Bot Flag, looking at the bot flag log, it's not listed. And according to the log it's not listed either, so just want to clarify that just to be on the safe side. Q T C 05:59, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Probably a mistake because its a second task, ill fix now. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 06:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- On a side note on the Approved log it mentions it already has the Bot Flag, looking at the bot flag log, it's not listed. And according to the log it's not listed either, so just want to clarify that just to be on the safe side. Q T C 05:59, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.