Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/JackieBot
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Speedily Approved.
Operator: Jackie (talk · contribs)
Automatic or Manually assisted: manually
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: Standard pywikipedia bot
Function overview: interwiki
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): none
Edit period(s): one time, while patroling new pages
Estimated number of pages affected: a little, about 10-15 per day
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): No
Function details:
Discussion
editHi there Jackie. I see you've already been running this bot, please make sure you read through our bot policy, whichh explains not to do this until the bot is approved. Also, make sure you read the Restrictions on specific tasks > Interwiki links in particular. Will the bot avoid editing templates? And the outline above suggests that you will be running this bot with autonomous mode off, is that correct? - Kingpin13 (talk) 06:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- FYI this was discussed at WP:BN. As long as Kingpin's concerns are answered satisfactorily, this can probably be speedy approved. –xenotalk 20:07, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Bot don't touch templates and edit categories and main space only. Autonomous mode not used. I run bot during patrol new/changed pages and update engine everyday. From 34 edits of JackieBot account only 20 is a bot's edits, other is manually. — Jack 04:00, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedily Approved. Okay, looks fine - Kingpin13 (talk) 10:09, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Bot don't touch templates and edit categories and main space only. Autonomous mode not used. I run bot during patrol new/changed pages and update engine everyday. From 34 edits of JackieBot account only 20 is a bot's edits, other is manually. — Jack 04:00, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.