Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/H3llBot 8

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

H3llBot 8 edit

Operator: H3llkn0wz (talk · contribs)

Time filed: 08:43, Saturday June 11, 2011 (UTC)

Automatic or Manual: Automatic unsupervised

Programming language(s): C#

Source code available: N

Function overview: Move links from author/editor fields to author/editorlink=

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 42#Citation template authorlink generation

Edit period(s): Manually run

Estimated number of pages affected: ~~Unsure, not too many~~ Per trial I can see this is relatively common

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function details:

If |first= and |last= set; and |author= and |authorlink= not set

If |first= is a piped wikilink and |last= is text

Strip wikilink from |first= and move to |authorlink=

If |last= is a piped wikilink and |first= is text

Strip wikilink from |last= and move to |authorlink=

If |author= set; and |first=, |last=, and |authorlink= not set

If |author= is a wikilink

Strip wikilink from |author= and move to |authorlink=

See example of all cases.

Discussion edit

There's a very minor issue with the example edit - the bot adds in a space before the |authorlink= field. Once that's sorted (should be a fairly simple fix): Approved for trial (50). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. - EdoDodo ^talk 15:18, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Made the bot respect the most commonly used whitespace separator in the citation: [1]. Doing trial now. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 16:23, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. - EdoDodo ^talk 16:23, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. Should be around 50 pages done with this task only for easier review. Fixed a few bugs encountered. Otherwise, seems fine. I'll keep reviewing and spot-checking the edits for a while as usual. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 17:04, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. The edits look alright, with the exception of the bugs which we discussed over IRC and you fixed. - EdoDodo ^talk 20:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.