Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FireflyBot II 2

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

FireflyBot II 2 edit

Operator: Firefly (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 12:32, Sunday, November 21, 2021 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: https://gist.github.com/rwjuk/8691aacea7b66a7ae32c2308d3237e07

Function overview: Fixing duplicate references in articles caused by phab:T296044

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): BOTREQ and VPT thread

Edit period(s): One time run

Estimated number of pages affected: Upper bound 1,234 (based on this query)

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Bot will repair any duplicated references caused by the VE bug mentioned above.

Scope will be limited to the ~1000 pages or so that had VE edits during the rough period (2100 on 18/11 to 0200 on 19/11) when the buggy code was deployed, to limit the chances of it 'fixing' cases where the two references have been defined with different content. (See query that will be used.)

Intending to use the "FireflyBot II" account to segregate the edits from the continuous-run jobs on my other bot account (there's also a fun coincidence about FireflyBot II patching over another MediaWiki bug :') ), but if BAG feel that is a bad idea, I'm happy to use "I".

Discussion edit

Approved for trial (25 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. Thanks ProcrastinatingReader - diffs here. Two issues, one here caused by me stupidly forgetting to exclude no-content ref tags (causing the bot to remove ref content where a ref was invoked before it was defined), and one here down to mwparserfromhell having a somewhat expansive view of what a 'tag' is... :P. Both fixed, code updated. firefly ( t · c ) 15:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Let's do another quick trial (50 edits) to make sure there's no other edge cases.

Approved for extended trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:42, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ProcrastinatingReader - thanks, see here again. No edge-cases that I can see this time. :) firefly ( t · c ) 17:43, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. Whoops - forgot this for Anomiebot. firefly ( t · c ) 17:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. LGTM. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 18:08, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard.