Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AWMBot 2
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard. The result of the discussion was Denied.
Operator: BJackJS (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 15:32, Thursday, April 22, 2021 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: supervised
Programming language(s): Node
Source code available: https://github.com/Oppurtun/AWMBot/blob/main/task1.js
Function overview: The bot scans broken review templates then scans previous names and places it under the peer review template.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bot_requests#Bot_to_repair_broken_peer_review_links
Edit period(s): one time run
Estimated number of pages affected: Around 1000
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): No
Function details: The bot scans pages under the category. It then scans previous names and places it under the peer review template.
Discussion edit
Have any changes been made to address the feedback/issues discussed in Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AWMBot? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, there has been a change that involves the replacement of the entire tag with a near 0 margin of error with editing. BJackJS talk
- I think part of the issue there was that it was adding page titles which just didn't exist. For example Special:Diff/989309968, even though Wikipedia:Peer review/Becky (model)/archive1 is a redlink. Is that resolved? If so, what's the behaviour of this bot if it runs on a page like that? Will it skip, remove the entire peer review tag, or is there a different parameter name/value it will add? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm working on a function that verifies if a tag replacement is a redlink and it will then skip over that so it can be done manually by people who may have a better idea of what to do than an automated system. BJackJS talk
- Okay. Send me a ping once that's done and I'll be happy to send this for trial :). I don't think it's worth cycling through trials without that function, like in the previous BRFA, as in this edge case making those edits doesn't really solve the problem. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:38, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- User:ProcrastinatingReader The function has been added along with a major bugfix. BJackJS talk 17:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay. Send me a ping once that's done and I'll be happy to send this for trial :). I don't think it's worth cycling through trials without that function, like in the previous BRFA, as in this edge case making those edits doesn't really solve the problem. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:38, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm working on a function that verifies if a tag replacement is a redlink and it will then skip over that so it can be done manually by people who may have a better idea of what to do than an automated system. BJackJS talk
- I think part of the issue there was that it was adding page titles which just didn't exist. For example Special:Diff/989309968, even though Wikipedia:Peer review/Becky (model)/archive1 is a redlink. Is that resolved? If so, what's the behaviour of this bot if it runs on a page like that? Will it skip, remove the entire peer review tag, or is there a different parameter name/value it will add? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This bot appears to have edited since this BRFA was filed. Bots may not edit outside their own or their operator's userspace unless approved or approved for trial. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:57, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 02:09, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @BJackJS: Gently following up on the status of the trial? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:36, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Denied. as inactive for months and operator posted a retired banner on their userpage earlier this month. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 02:02, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard.