Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron – Rescue list/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

Entries from May 2012

Note: The entries here are in a basic reverse-chronological order, in which newer entries are posted at the top of the archive.

Higher Earth

Higher Earth was retained. The AfD discussion resulted in no consensus

The coverage I found to prove its notability is not enough to convince some people. Assistance in finding more to prove its notability beyond any reasonable doubt, would be appreciated. Dream Focus 07:05, 29 May 2012 (UTC) It sure would help if mass media reported more about comics/comic books. Comics are under-reported in terms of coverage about particular titles and publishers. Meantime, articles about newer animated television shows, such as List of The Simpsons episodes (a featured list article), continue to reign. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC) Also, it's likely unprofitable for corporate news media to provide significant coverage about comic book titles, because comic books are less mainstream nowadays, and hence less popular. In the age of infotainment, hopefully Wikipedia won't lose a bunch of worthy articles due to the intrinsic profit motives inherent in corporate mass media, in which less popular topics receive less coverage due to profit motives that favor popular topics in order to promote higher readership/viewership numbers, which correlates with higher advertising revenues. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:11, 31 May 2012 (UTC) Some sources: These sources below offer significant coverage, but are somewhat uncertain regarding how strongly they correlate to source reliability in terms of Wikipedia's guidelines for sources (at WP:RELIABLE). 'Higher Earth': Sam Humphries' Sci-Fi Revenge Epic [Exclusive Preview.] Comics Alliance. Best Shots Extra: X-MEN LEGACY, GREEN LANTERN, More. Newsarama. —Northamerica1000(talk) 23:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC) All Wikiprojects keep list of what sources are considered reliable. I didn't find any discussion for comics so started one. Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Comics/References#Websites_that_qualify_as_a_reliable_source_for_comic_book_reviews Everyone agrees Newsarama is. No one against the other one. Dream Focus 23:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC) The article was retained; the AfD discussion resulted in no consensus. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:29, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

UTasker

UTasker was deleted
This article about an embedded operating system would benefit from clean-up and better organization. Since it's being considered for deletion, the addition of more reliable sources is also appropriate. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:09, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Structured Noise (music)

Structured Noise (music) was merged to Noise music
An unsourced article up for deletion; the topic is related to Industrial music. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:15, 26 May 2012 (UTC) The result of the AfD discussion was to merge to Noise music. (  Y Merger complete. ). Northamerica1000(talk) 02:57, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Indie hip hop

Indie hip hop was merged to Underground hip hop
A topic of disputed notability. Needs improvement and RS. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:42, 26 May 2012 (UTC) The result of the AfD discussion was to merge to Underground hip hop. (  Y Merger complete. ). Northamerica1000(talk) 02:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Runet (term)

Runet (term) was retained in the encyclopedia

Nominated for deletion to be removed from the encyclopedia per a rationale of being a dictionary definition. However, the term is exceedingly more complex than a simple dictionary definition. For example, (from the Wikipedia article): "in 2009, a Yandex report stated that Runet can pertain to sites written in Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian and Kazakh languages​​, as well as sites in any language published in the national domain .am, .az, .by, .ge, .kg, .kz, .md, .ru, .su, .tj, .ua или uz". Hence this request is being posted here to improve the article and find/add additional reliable sources. —Northamerica1000(talk) 04:30, 26 May 2012 (UTC) The article was retained in the encyclopedia. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:58, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Triptyque

Triptyque was deleted

An article about an architectural firm. This is a request to help find sources to better-qualify this topic's notability, and if found, to also add them to the article. Sources include: "Triptyque". Dezeen Magazine. Retrieved 2009-03-01. Triptyque, Brazil". Architecture and Urbanism. April, 2009. (in French) 2008 NAJA Winners (This link redirects to 2012 information on this website). Comments: Perhaps someone on Wikipedia may have access to the following article to confirm its contents: Triptyque, Brazil". Architecture and Urbanism. April, 2009. Also, it's asserted in the article: "Triptyque was one of 15 firms recognized in the 2008 Nouveaux Albums des Jeunes Architects (NAJA), an annual award of the French Ministry of Culture." Assistance is appreciated! This is not a request to immediately go to the AfD discussion and !vote. However, with Wikipedia being a public website, people can of course do whatever they desire, regardless of requests within rescue requests to not immediately !vote. It's common sense that people who post requests for rescue consideration here do not have any control over what other people type on their computers (at any time). Northamerica1000(talk) 15:50, 25 May 2012 (UTC) The article was deleted. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:23, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Curtis Magazines

Information was merged to List of magazines released by Marvel Comics in the 1970s

Marvel comics published a lot of magazines. Most seem to be objecting to the name of the article, instead of its content. I need help finding coverage of Marvel's magazine division used to avoid the Comics Code Authority. Dream Focus 09:23, 29 May 2012 (UTC) An interesting article that I learned new information from. After some source searching, finding coverage about the comics that Curtis Magazines published, rather than significant coverage about the topic itself. If the AfD discussion results in delete, there's always the book Marvel Comics Imprints, published by a company that creates books from Wikipedia articles and other online free sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:08, 29 May 2012 (UTC) Information appears to have been merged to List of magazines released by Marvel Comics in the 1970s. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:40, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Academic Journals Database

Academic Journals Database was deleted

The article has been nominated for deletion for lacking topic notability, yet many editors on the article's talk page and at the AfD discussion have demonstrated a strong interest in improving the article. Perhaps this WikiProject can help out to improve the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:29, 26 May 2012 (UTC) The article was removed from the encyclopedia. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:20, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Leslie Daigle

The Leslie Daigle article was deleted, with a redirect to California State Assembly elections, 2012

The article has sources but could use a rewrite, there is a campaign it seems to me by several users to repeatedly erase cited content and whitewash the article into a state where it looks like there is not enough sources or content.LuciferWildCat (talk) 20:22, 23 May 2012 (UTC) The article is locked from any editor editing at the moment, that's pretty rare for something at AfD.--Milowent • hasspoken 20:35, 23 May 2012 (UTC) Off-topic comments (this WikiProject's focus is to improve and rescue articles) Speedy close as canvassing: This should not have been tagged for rescue because a) the article is full-protected, and b) It's been tagged once before. It shouldn't be tagged right now pbp 21:13, 23 May 2012 (UTC) You're not an ARS member so your view is dismissed. We know Lucifer is more likely to tag than many other editors, its not helped him unless an article actually can be helped.--Milowent • hasspoken 23:34, 23 May 2012 (UTC) It is not canvassing. If you are sure of your case, you wouldn't mind having others state their opinions there. Odd to have so many people show up this time at the AFD. The last one was closed on May 7th 2012, just 16 days ago. Only one ARS member went there and said keep after LuciferWildCat tagged it. So claiming that "Previous discussion was closed as no consensus due to ARS canvassin" is obviously in error. Dream Focus 00:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC) "It's not canvassing" says the guy who voted keep less than four hours after it was ARS tagged... pbp 01:00, 24 May 2012 (UTC) Question LuciferWildCat, have you EVER seen an AfD that you did not immediately nominate for rescue? --MelanieN (talk) 23:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC) All the time, and if you put any effort into that question you would have easily found I vote to delete articles nearly 40% of the time. PBP is the antagonist here and you are taking his side because perhaps you find it the path of least resistance. Since he has never abided by his agreement to leave me and articles I work on alone and I am more reasonable you are instead blaming me for all that you find wrong in the wiki world. He persistently accuses me of canvassing and that is a personal attack and harassment. He was bothered so much by the rescue feature that he personally lobbied to half way destroy it as a personal vendetta. Rescuing is about finding the sources and reevaluating an overhauled article into a notable state. Constantly opening ten threads about an elephant's toejam is disruptive.LuciferWildCat (talk) 01:11, 25 May 2012 (UTC) Sounds like a personal attack. Try to remain civil. Dream Focus 23:58, 23 May 2012 (UTC) She's right in that said user has repeatedly misused the rescue function. pbp 01:07, 24 May 2012 (UTC) I have spoken to LuciferWildCat about this before. It is a pattern with him, and I think it may be approaching the point of crying wolf. But that's for the members here to decide. --MelanieN (talk) 04:13, 24 May 2012 (UTC) Why don't you waste your time accusing PBP of misusing the AfD function instead. All I work on is adding more content and improving articles, I have a flare for the hard to cite but that is what wikipedia is about, finding great information about topics that would be difficult to research or unlikely to have more than a one line entry in an encyclopedia. Furthermore over time more content is found by more people but without a landing zone these articles will never properly form. Where there are sources there is a place for articles. Constant acosting by PBP is the only misuse of the project going on here, not efforts to improve.LuciferWildCat (talk) 01:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC) Note This little war between LuciferWildCat and Purplebackpack just escalated onto the talk pages of a bunch of third parties including mine. The enmity between these two is toxic and it is hurting Wikipedia. They have been to ANI about it before. --MelanieN (talk) 15:00, 25 May 2012 (UTC) Topic notability Sources: Some sources about the topic Leslie Daigle: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:54, 25 May 2012 (UTC) As of this post (26 May 2012 (UTC)), the article remains as protected, in which only Wikipedia administrators can edit the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC) More sources: Michael J. Mishak; Anthony York (May 19, 2012). "Centrist GOP candidates may offer chance to end California gridlock". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2012-05-24. Mona Shadia (May 16, 2012). "Mansoor accuses opponent of willingness to work with unions". Huntington Beach Independent. Retrieved 2012-05-24. Martin Wisckol (May 17, 2012). "Benefactor now up to $270k for Assembly candidate Daigle". Orange County Register. Retrieved 2012-05-24. Daigle...would be the favorite to beat Rush in a one-on-one race and could be a formidable opponent for Mansoor in a head-to-head matchup. Jeff Overley (February 2, 2010). "Political cash flows in Newport Beach". The Orange County Register. Retrieved 2012-05-24. Brianna Brialla (February 06, 2009). "Dredging banking on stimulus funds. City officials have estimated as much as $16 million is needed to complete the project in Newport Bay, Harbor". Daily Pilot. A Los Angeles Times Website. Retrieved 2012-05-24. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help) —Northamerica1000(talk) 01:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC) Additional new sources This regional coverage further demonstrates the topic's notability, in which the topic now passes WP:BASIC, WP:GNG and criteria #3 of WP:POLITICIAN: Significant coverage from The Orange County Register: Activist outspends 2 candidates in 74th Assembly Significant coverage from The Orange County Register: My take on Leslie Daigle (Published in the news section of the newspaper, not the opinion section) Short article from The Orange County Register: Candidate Daigle gets another $200,000 from Munger Significant coverage: "No clear favorite in 74th Assembly race." The Orange County Register. Significant coverage: "Assembly candidate Daigle gets $178,000 boost." The Orange County Register. Beyond passing mentions: "Eyebrows go up when Daigle mentions Bergeson, Brewer." The Orange County Register. These can be used to expand and improve the article, once the article's full page protection has been lifted. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:51, 28 May 2012 (UTC) Leslie Daigle – Closed as redirect The article's AfD discussion closed as redirect to California State Assembly elections, 2012. The closer's rationale was rather generic: "With the history deleted. Most commenters agree that there should not be a separate article on this subject." The closer may have possibly based the closure upon a simple !vote count (against Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion), as there was no analysis whatsoever in the closure about the addition of new sources to the discussion about the topic's notability, and many that !voted apparently didn't revisit the discussion and actually see the new sources. Also, prior to its deletion, the article was under full protection, and no editors other than administrators were able to work on improving it. Then it was removed from the encyclopedia. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:16, 29 May 2012 (UTC) OMG...ARS isn't the place to editorialize about closures you don't like. And WP:IDONTLIKEIT is about all that this DRV would be running on, whereas the endorsement of the decision has a better than 2:1 consensus behind it. Do the community a favor and don't start an pointless DRV that will amount to wasting a lot of time, but having the same result as the AfD pbp 21:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC) Most commentators agree shows that the admin considered it a vote to redirect. The closing admin did not consider the arguments validity and this should be taken to DRV on that basis.LuciferWildCat (talk) 19:37, 29 May 2012 (UTC) Comment: According to |the California Secretary of State's office, Daigle came in dead last in the primary and has been eliminated from contention for the Assembly seat. pbp 17:12, 6 June 2012 (UTC) A total non-shock, her claim for notability had nothing to do with that particular bid for office.--Milowent • hasspoken 17:51, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Squish by froglogic

Another software article being discussed for deletion that would benefit from expansion and the addition of more reliable sources.Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:11, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

• The article was retained in the encyclopedia. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:22, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

FlashFXP

A software article being discussed for removal from the encyclopedia that would benefit from expansion and the addition of more reliable sources. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:09, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Sources added to the article:

• (in Dutch) Wagenaar, Abram (February 2011). "FlashFXP 4 (Review)". Personal Computer Magazine. Retrieved May 26, 2012. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
• (in French) Odinot, Stanislas (October 13, 2004). "FlashFXP 3.0: the best pros for FTP download". 01 Business & Technologies Magazine. Retrieved May 26, 2012. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)

—Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:48, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

• The article was retained on Wikipedia. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:44, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Hip pop

A topic of disputed notability. Needs improvement and RS. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:43, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

• The article was deleted. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:48, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

NuttX RTOS

A lengthy AfD discussion is occurring for this article. Perhaps this WikiProject can help to improve the article and provide more reliable sources to better qualify the topic's notability. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:00, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

• The article was deleted from the encyclopedia. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:49, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

The Babies

The article is up for vote right now. The band is notable, with sources from The New York Times, New York Observer, and New York Magazine. There seems to be some bias against the group because it isn't some sort of stadium filling act, but an independent garage rock band.Thriley (talk) 06:12, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Please explain further how you think the article can be improved. This WikiProject is not about !voting at AfD discussions, so clarification is necessary. Thanks for your consideration. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:13, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

There is plenty of information from reliable sources to improve the band history. I would do it myself, but I don't have very much time to do it over the next few days. I am worried that it will be deleted before I can improve it. I am asking for assistance in improving the band history. Good sources are provided on the article page.Thriley (talk) 07:21, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying your stance, it is appreciated. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:37, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

• Northamerica1000, that isn't necessary and never has been. Anyone asking for assistance here obviously believes an article to be notable, and wants help find references to prove it. Dream Focus 08:42, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the input. The person did help to clarify what could use improvement within the article, though, and many reliable sources were already present in the article in it's (former) Further reading section (now titled "Additional sources") at the time of the post here. Hence, it didn't appear that a request for source searching was implied in the listing here, because many were already existent in the article. Best, Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:40, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

• The article was retained in the encyclopedia. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:33, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

1/0 (web comic)

Renomination of webcomic by same guy, all arguments the same as previous. Debate on whether an award featured in the New York Times and elsewhere is notable. Dream Focus 11:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

• The article was deleted from the encyclopedia. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:58, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

The Whiteboard

A nominator is renominating various webcomics he previously sent to AFD. This one had notable coverage found in the first two AFDs already. Dream Focus 10:57, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

• The article was deleted from the encyclopedia. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:25, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Last Res0rt

A webcomic which by webcomic standards I think is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. One decent reference found already. Dream Focus 23:47, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

• The article was deleted from the encyclopedia. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:25, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

John Mason (schoolmaster)

This is a stub article on a living person who has served as the headmaster of some of India's most prestigious and important schools. I've not yet had time to check for sources but it seems inconceivable that it's not possible to write an encyclopaedic article about such a person, though sources for India are obviously much less comprehensive than those for the UK. Regardless of sourcing it is important to maintain a balance of articles on Wikipedia to counter the inherent Wikipedia:Systemic bias. If anyone has time to help to help out and find sources for this article it would be much appreciated. Dahliarose (talk) 11:15, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

• The article was retained in the encyclopedia. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:28, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Gabriel Pizza

The article needs more sources to establish topic notability. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:23, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

• The article was retained in the encyclopedia. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:27, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Mitt Romney Cranbrook incident

Someone decided the issue needed expansion, too much to fit in the main article, so on the Mitt Romney talk page said they create this for it. Valid content fork? I've been working on fixing some of the information to get the whole story. Some help would be appreciated. Dream Focus 15:22, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

I am the editor that saw this issue was too big to fit comfortably on existing pages which were already long. My goal has been to keep with the objectives of Wikipedia and carefully negotiate between those that wish to squash anything bad about a candidate that they support, and those that wish to blow up anything bad to support an opposing candidate. This subject is too big to hide and has filled hundreds of newspapers on the front page and not showing this article is censorship. The newspaper reporters that worked on this article were carefully reviewed and everything written reviewed by a David Maraniss. Please return this page along with cross links to page Mitt Romney and Mitt Romney 2012 campaign.Pbmaise (talk) 02:50, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

There is enough valid information to fill in its own article. Its a valid content fork. And the current version of the article is rather nicely done. It wouldn't all fit properly in a different article. Dream Focus 03:38, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

• The article was deleted from the encyclopedia. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:25, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Corinne Narassiguin

French Socialist part's candidate for the 1st time election of a represntative of North American French residents in the upcoming legislative election. — Racconish^Tk 20:18, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

• The article was retained in the encyclopedia. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:28, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Mithila (Nepal)

Mithila (Nepal) – AfD discussion closed as keep

Needs more sources to demonstrate notability and copy editing. Several sources currently in the article are in Nepali, and help with translation is needed. I've requested help with translation and improving the article at WikiProject Nepal here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Nepal – Mithila (Nepal). Northamerica1000(talk) 12:08, 4 May 2012 (UTC) I have added few new sources, which are in English now. Please have a look on the article Mithila (Nepal) again. Thanks Vikas11004315 (talk) 09:52, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Cinematic television

Cinematic television – AfD discussion closed as keep
This topic seems likely to interest our membership. Warden (talk) 09:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Kirby Bliss Blanton

Kirby Bliss Blanton – AfD discussion closed as keep

Kirby Bliss Blanton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Article is currently the subject of a BLP PROD AfD, the second on the topic. She has appeared on a couple well-known cable TV shows, so there's a chance sources could exist pbp 17:35, 1 May 2012 (UTC) Yep. You just take a brief moment to Google news archive search her name and the name of either of the two films she has played a significant role in, and you can find some mentions proving she passes WP:NACTOR. Dream Focus 21:53, 1 May 2012 (UTC) I see no reason why you have to berate me for nomming this, Dream, as you did in your edit summary. I nominated it for rescue and rescue, for once, actually worked the way it's supposed to pbp 18:13, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Gnosticism in popular culture

Gnosticism in popular culture – AfD discussion closed as delete
Who has the sacred knowledge to redeem and save this topic? Are you The One? Warden (talk) 19:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Forward (generic name of socialist publications)

Forward (generic name of socialist publications) – Nomination for rescue consideration withdrawn: the article has been deleted

This article has been nominated for deletion for several reasons, including (per the nomination) lacking reliable sources, the topic having an inability to be attributed to reliable sources, and other reasons. I wasn't aware of this use of the word prior to reading the article, and if the article didn't exist, I likely never would have learned about its content. Perhaps this project can help to improve the article, as it appears to be of encyclopedic worth. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC) Do not use WP to promote your political bullshit. Sorry, folks, this is a political ploy by some tea party yahoos, not a legitimate article. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 06:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC) Can you provide any evidence that the page was created by the political right? The page was created on January 1, 2011, around 16 months before the Obama-Biden campaign announced their campaign slogan. Here's the diff page. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:44, 3 May 2012 (UTC) Irrelvant. The article was a misguided stub attempt at a disambiguation page until it was discovered by political activists and given it's present form. It never would have survived AfD, even in its previous form. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 20:55, 3 May 2012 (UTC) No offense, but not exactly. Here's the diff page for the article's state on 26 November 2011, in which much of the information that's currently in the article was present at that time. The article has been expanded since that time, with a significant amount of editing activity occurring as of 30 April 2012‎ (UTC), which is almost certainly associated with/due to with the announcement of the Obama-Biden campaign slogan. The nomination for deletion states (in part) that the topic lacks reliable sources and is somehow unable to be sourced, so the article has been listed here for rescue consideration, to improve the article. Fact is, if the Obama-Biden campaign hadn't titled their campaign slogan "forward", this article likely wouldn't have been nominated for deletion at this time. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:21, 3 May 2012 (UTC) Nomination for rescue consideration withdrawn at this time. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Forward (Obama–Biden campaign slogan)

Forward (Obama–Biden campaign slogan) – Nomination for rescue consideration withdrawn

The topic appears to have received significant coverage in reliable sources and as such seems to be worthy of a stand-alone article, but the page is currently under full protection until 17:12, 5 May 2012 (UTC) (here's the diff page), so it's currently unable to be edited by most Wikipedia users. Per this project's scope to improve articles being considered for deletion, here are some sources I have found which can be used to do so: Memoli, Michael A. (April 30, 2012). "Obama campaign video teases new slogan: 'Forward'". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved May 02, 2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); External link in |publisher= (help) Condon, Stephanie (April 30, 2012). "Obama's 2012 campaign pitch: "Forward"". CBS News. Retrieved May 02, 2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); External link in |publisher= (help) Associated Press (April 30, 2012). "Obama Unveils New Campaign Slogan: 'Forward'". U.S.News & World Report. Retrieved May 02, 2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); External link in |publisher= (help) Kiser, Grace (April 30, 2012). "Obama campaign reveals new slogan: "Forward"". Reuters (Newsblog). Retrieved May 02, 2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); External link in |publisher= (help) After the full protection period has ended, in which only Wikipedia administrators can contribute to the article, perhaps this project can help out to improve the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC) More sources from the article's talk page: Morton, Victor (April 30, 2012). "New Obama slogan has long ties to Marxism, socialism". 'Washington Times. Retrieved May 02, 2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help) Delamaide, Darrell (May 1, 2012). "Obama's new slogan raises issue of the 'S word'". Wall Street Journal - Market Watch. Retrieved May 02, 2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help) Salzman, Jason (May 02, 2012). "ALEC Co-Director: The Marxists Are Coming After Us!". Huffington Post. Retrieved May 02, 2012. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help) Wingfield, Kyle (May 01, 2012). "2012 Tuesday: Team Obama moves 'Forward' by dredging up, distorting Romney's words from 2007". Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved May 02, 2012. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help) Galupo, Scott (May 2, 2012). "What Barack Obama's 'Forward' Slogan Really Means". U.S.News & World Report. Retrieved May 2, 2012. —Northamerica1000(talk) 22:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC) That AfD is going to be a mess (it already is). I especially enjoy seeing two votes to "SENSOR" the article.--Milowent • hasspoken 23:21, 2 May 2012 (UTC) An option is for the content to be a part of the Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2012 article, rather than as a stand-alone article. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:42, 3 May 2012 (UTC) After consideration, a redirect to Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2012 – Slogan, which already covers the topic seems to be in order. While this topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources which qualifies it as a stand-alone article, it's not necessarily necessary to have one. No prejudice toward recreation if the Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2012 becomes increasingly lengthy. (Struck listing header on this page.) Northamerica1000(talk) 20:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC) Do we have a slogan article for every campaign in US history? Even for any other notable ones at all? The creation of "articles" like this - by people trying to insert POV nonsense - is why Wikipedia is a joke. Let it die already. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.196.233.155 (talk • contribs) 03:48, 3 May 2012 (UTC) Vacuous POV-pushing crap like this doesn't need 'rescuing'. This isn't a tea-party blog. Stick it where the sun don't shine... AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:34, 3 May 2012 (UTC) Per the comment directly above, some options for the article's placement could include a cave and the dark side of the moon.Cheerio! Northamerica1000(talk) 21:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC) Comment: Most of the discussion here belongs on the article's talk page and not on this one pbp 13:34, 4 May 2012 (UTC) Per my post above to redirect, I've withdrawn this nomination for article rescue. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:23, 7 May 2012 (UTC)