Welcome to Wikipedia

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Zosimo Montez, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mr mark taylor (talk) 22:46, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Page moves

edit

Please do not move pages via cut and paste. That violates copyright because you lose the edit history of the original article. You need to use the "move this page" link on the side of the page. I will revert your moves as they are violations of copyright. Corvus cornixtalk 23:28, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Radyo Ng Bayan Lucena page move

edit

Hello, Zosimo Montez. It appears that you copied and pasted Radyo Ng Bayan Lucena to DWLC. Please do not move articles by copying and pasting them because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself using the move link at the top of the page, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you, • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

May 2008

edit

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to User:203.87.181.218‎, you will be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Multiple user accounts

edit

You appear to be running at least three simultaneous accounts. You should be aware of Wikipedia's policies on this practice, which is known as sockpuppetry. I have no reason to assume that you are doing this for any suspicious reasons, although the claim that all 3 accounts are your first cannot be true. I have posted that issue at WP:Suspected sock puppets, asking that someone more experienced in this policy assist you. Thus I am obliged by procedure to post the following section Kevin McE (talk) 11:05, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Zosimo Montez for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Kevin McE (talk) 11:21, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Me

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zosimo Montez (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I learned a lesson. I promise I will never do hoax articles again and I will never make usernames under me. -- Zosimo Montez (talk) 09:16, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

What makes you think we'll believe you now since you've already made that promise before? That was two months ago and you've made many sockpuppet accounts since then including this one. If you completely stop editing Wikipedia for at least a year, then maybe an administrator might give you a second chance then, but for the time being, you've been way too disruptive for any of us to let you resume editing straight away. --  Netsnipe  ►  09:34, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zosimo Montez (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I want to be blocked for 1 day. I cannot really make it when I am blocked for a year.

Decline reason:

No means no — Chris 10:35, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.