Zhuyuxiang

Proposed deletion of Crisis or Transformation

Hello, Zhuyuxiang. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Crisis or Transformation, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ishdarian 09:58, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Crisis or Transformation

Hello, Zhuyuxiang,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Crisis or Transformation should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crisis or Transformation .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Ishdarian 12:48, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Transformation in Economics

The article Transformation in Economics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced WP:ESSAY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 05:16, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Transformation in Economics may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• in the sequence of four undergone transformations, namely agriculture, industry, services and GWU ((government, welfare and unemployment)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:27, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Transformation in Economics

Interesting article, but it needs some more editing. Bearian (talk) 23:34, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Milan Zeleny

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Milan Zeleny, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://ebooks.iospress.nl/Download/Pdf/29019, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Milan Zeleny and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Milan Zeleny, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Milan Zeleny with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Milan Zeleny. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Milan Zeleny saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Palu (talk) 14:59, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Would you please explain this edit: [1]??? You basically brought copyrighted material, I started to rewrite it, and now you are reverting me?--Ymblanter (talk) 04:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

content issues

What you need to do is find content that other people have written and had published in reliable source about Milan Zeleny. then you need to write it in your own words, presenting the content in a neutral point of view without excessive promotion and including both positive and negative content. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:49, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Evolution of Mangement Systems, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Just-in-time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Technology Support Net

The article Technology Support Net has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 02:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Technology Support Net may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Technology & Decision Making|volume=11|page=P 441|publisher=World Scientific}}</ref> }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Technology Support Net, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loci (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Technology Support Net

Hi,

The page about which you are inquiring was deleted via Wikipedia's proposed deletion process, which means that the request of any editor -- including yourself -- is sufficient to have the article restored. Having said that, your message to me suggested that this subject was a "quite new term." I understand that you have expertise in this area, and you may have devoted much time and study to this concept. However, Wikipedia is not a place to promote "quite new terms": this fits the definition of a neologism, a type of article that is routinely considered inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Put simply, encyclopedias exist to document established concepts, not to promote new ones. I will move the article on Technology Support Net to your sandbox for you to edit. For the article to remain in the encyclopedia, you must present evidence that the term is not "quite new"; but rather, is a well-established concept within its field. If such evidence is unavailable, then the article should not be written. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 17:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Evolution of Management Systems) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Evolution of Management Systems, Zhuyuxiang!

Wikipedia editor Polyglot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for your contribution, I renamed the page though.

To reply, leave a comment on Polyglot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)