Leave your messages here and I will reply here too. Zekir Bosniak (talk) 15:13, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

February 2010 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Radovan Karadžić. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tadija (talk) 22:42, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

March 2010 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Radovan Karadžić, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rodhullandemu 18:03, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Every informtion I write about Radovan Karadzic is checkable though our reliable sources sucha sthe BBC, SKY, CNN and western news networks. Zekir Bosniak (talk) 12:31, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

And Serbo-Croatian kinship: what does Bosnian politics have to do with the word for "uncle"? Clearly inappropriate soapboxing. kwami (talk) 17:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have WP:blocked you for the comment "take your nationalism somewhere else fascists" at Socialist Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina: See WP:No personal attacks. AFAIK, your edit is incorrect, as there was no official Bosnian language at the time of the socialist republic, but regardless, you need to learn to share the sandbox with the other kids. If you don't, you are not welcome here. If there are Serbs or Croats making similar attacks, they may also be blocked. kwami (talk) 17:21, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
OK, when does my block finish? Zekir Bosniak
05:15 UTC. Rodhullandemu 22:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Greater Serbia appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Tadija (talk) 23:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kosovo, you will be blocked from editing. Tadija (talk) 21:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for POV page moves. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 21:33, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

{{Unblock|Please unblock. My exiry time was officially yesterday yet I remain unable to edit}}

I do not see an active block and/or autoblock of this account. What message do you see when you try to edit? TNXMan 13:20, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zekir Bosniak (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have the following as per below

Decline reason:

As per EdJohnston's suggestion below, I have indefinitely blocked this account because it is used only for disruptive nationalist POV-pushing.  Sandstein  20:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are currently unable to edit pages on Wikipedia. You can still read pages, but you cannot edit, change, or create them. Editing from 88.96.108.118 has been disabled by Dominic for the following reason(s):


 CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address (or network) has been used abusively. 

This address (or network) has been blocked temporarily or permanently to prevent further abuse.


In extreme cases, an entire network may be blocked to prevent an abusive user from continually changing their IP address in order to evade blocks or abusing multiple accounts. If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please follow these instructions.

Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed.

Users: If you already have an account in good standing, you may request IP block exemption to bypass this block. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.


This block has been set to expire: 21:41, 3 April 2010.

Even if blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and contact other editors and administrators by e-mail.

Note: Please use the [show] links across from each header to show more information.

I have left a message for Dominic asking him to review the situation. TNXMan 16:20, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
I did not find a rangeblock. This seems to be a conventional block of the IP address, for two months starting 3 February 2010. Yet Zekir Bosniak was able to edit on 6 March. Zekir, have you been using more than one IP? It looks as though your account would be free to edit if you can get access to the internet elsewhere than on 88.96.108.118. Since your account was only created on 25 February, Dominic is unlikely to have had your edits in mind when he imposed his 3 Feb block of the IP. Most likely Dominic did the block to stop some registered user (whose name we don't know) who was abusing multiple accounts via this IP. Unless you are actually a sock of some other editor you should be able to resume editing. EdJohnston (talk) 02:33, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi guys, thanks for pointing me here. The block was originally targeting User:Human Rights Believer, a banned sockpuppeteer who used it for several accounts. As this account edits Balkans ethnic/nationalist topics in a similar way, I would guess it is another sockpuppet. I will check for more accounts or and the possibility of a range block when I can get some time tomorrow. (It's rather late—or early depending on your perspective—here right now.) Dominic·t 10:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
To check behavior to see if Zekir is likely to be the same editor as Human Rights Believer, the sock case at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Z_Victor_Alpha/Archive would be relevant. Since Zekir Bosniak appears to be a 100% nationalist edit-warrior I personally would favor an indef block of his registered account. To get an idea of his attitude, check the list of his contributions and look at the edit summaries. EdJohnston (talk) 11:34, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply