Zakira seidu
| This user is a student editor in UC_Denver/PBHL_2052_(Spring_2018) . |
Welcome!
editHello, Zakira seidu, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:52, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Peer Review - Samone
editThe introduction (lead section) was really good, and the opening sentence caught my attention. The lead section really gives a layout and information that I can expect to learn about from reading the rest of this article. The tone is very good. Very neutral. There are some sentence structure issues that could be fixed, and there are some citations that are should be in-text citations, or are phrased in a way that seems like they are in-citations, but are not cited as such.
The article overall has a clear structure, I really like how it's broken up, and there seems to balance of coverage. No section in the article is over or under extended in my opinion. The article does a good job of explaining a concept, explaining its effects on the African community, and giving adequate information on a topic. Maybe the Methods Section and the Factors Affecting Prevalence should be switched. It could better the flow of the article.The section about cultural attitudes really adds to multiple perspectives of the article and doesn't give the article a biased tone.
Maybe you could find another word to use other an attitude? Sometimes the word attitude was negative connotations attached to it.
When looking at the dates of the references most of them seem to be from 2010 and above. Which is good because you want the information in the article to represent the most recent information. So, more recent information could be even better! I couldn't find the link for citations #6, but the majority of the sources are from reliable sources and studies.
Overall, great article! I really enjoyed it.
Image without license
editUnspecified source/license for File:Contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning among maried or in-union women aged 15 to 49 in 2015.pdf
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning among maried or in-union women aged 15 to 49 in 2015.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 03:45, 12 April 2018 (UTC)