ZAHIDMZ
Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Hello, ZAHIDMZ, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Learn from others
- Be kind to others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us a bit about yourself
- Our great guide to Wikipedia
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains(talk) 15:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Faqir Ali Muhammad Gilkar Sahab
editHello, ZAHIDMZ,
Thanks for creating Faqir Ali Muhammad Gilkar Sahab! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Please add your references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Boleyn (talk) 20:21, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- A new re-copy upload of this article is under discussion here. Acabashi (talk) 16:08, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Faqeer Gilkar Sahab moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, Faqeer Gilkar Sahab, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:08, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
March 2019
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:52, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
ZAHIDMZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
sir i know i edit some accounts but i really don't know that it voilets the wikipedia policies. now i am requesting ur goodself please unblock my account i will never edit any account i apologies for my mistake. i will never edit any other page. please please please unblock my account that will be your most kindness.
Decline reason:
If you are never going to edit, there is no reason to unblock you, as a block does not prevent you from reading Wikipedia. You are welcome to request unblock once there is something that you want to edit. 331dot (talk) 08:25, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ZAHIDMZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
hello sir 'Ali muhammad Gilkar' page is very close to me i want to write about it and you people are not giving me second chance. Ali muhammad Gilkar sahab is my master and i want to write about him and want to create a wikipedia page. sir i beg to u please unblock me give me second chance please.
Decline reason:
You are still abusing multiple accounts and you are still trying to edit an area where you have a conflict of interest. Yunshui 雲水 11:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Just want to note that Zahid socked again just yesterday with Special:Contributions/Salahuddin111. Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
ZAHIDMZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
hello sir I want only one chance and I want to write about 'Ali Muhammad gilkar' and I will never try to cross limits I promise. I want second chance. This is my humble request to you please give me one more chance that will be your most kindness. Thank you
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:19, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Given your recent violations of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE, your best hope, though it's slim, is to follow WP:SO. That requires zero edits across any accounts for at least six months. --Yamla (talk) 18:19, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
ZAHIDMZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
sir i am accepting my fault that i violate the policies of wikipedia but i apologies for that and i will nor cause any damage or disruption and will make useful contributions. sir you know God is also giving second chance to everyone but i don't know why you people are not giving me second chance. i hope that i will get second chance
Decline reason:
Personally I'd say you wasted your second chance when you engaged in more sockpuppetry while already blocked for sockpuppetry. Nonetheless the standard offer remains available to you, though that's not a guarantee. In six months you can make use of WP:UTRS. You may want to read the Guide to appealing blocks first; your unblock request will need to be quite a bit more persuasive than what you wrote here. Huon (talk) 21:59, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have revoked talk page access. You've been given a path forward, a way to get a second chance. You refuse to explain your violations of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE, so you are really just wasting our time here. Another admin will be along shortly to review your unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 10:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)