Yujoong

Yujoong, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Yujoong! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Yujoong. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Yujoong. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Hello. An edit request you recently made to Talk:Huang Jingyu was empty and has been removed, Please see planning an edit request for more information on how to place a proper request. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 00:54, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Yujoong! Your additions to The Guest (TV series) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. The synopsis you added here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Guest_(TV_series)&oldid=871798013 is a copy-paste from MyDramaList. Thank you. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 19:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited One Piece, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nami. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

manga sales

hello. I am here to talk about manga sales. I understand that some websites might translation mistakes. And Japanese source is correct but older and outdated now. We update them here whenever newer source comes Japanese or English. And if you read Mangaplus source the Shueisha editor/worker himself says Kishimoto already sold 250 million copies with Naruto (Most reliable source the publisher itself) And more than 250m right now because that Japanese article is from 2019. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruderhymer (talk • contribs) 13:24, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Yes, because until right now there is still no new update regarding the manga sales of the manga. Usually, they will update the circulation in how many years like what happened of Detective Conan after the release 100th volume. Before, the last update is 2018. The naruto will be updated maybe after they will also update the circulation of boruto.

Another is when it comes to "sold", even the Shuiesha cannot give even the approximate total solds of the manga. That is why they are relying on "Oricon" chart released by the Oricon Company. According to Oricon, the only mangas to surpass 100 million sold are One Piece and Demon Slayer.

To summary, The only Shuiesha can release information is the total circulation or printed of the manga while the Oricon gives the total sold of the mangas. Futhermore, the article given by the mangaplus is mistranslated and until right now, there is no new updated circulation of naruto manga released. Selenne (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok but still we hear a number from Shueisha edıtor. Why are you removing the source? Isn't it best source for English speakers? If you want Japanese source to stay, thats fine But I think you should add Mangaplus one as well for English speakers only.

reply to manga sales

Ok but still we hear a number from Shueisha edıtor. Why are you removing the source? Isn't it best source for English speakers? If you want Japanese source to stay, thats fine But I think you should add Mangaplus one as well for English speakers only.

If you still not convinced, read this japanese wikipedia of Naruto :https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NARUTO_-%E3%83%8A%E3%83%AB%E3%83%88- Selenne (talk) 14:42, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

I know it says 153 million in Japan and 97 million overseas total of 250 million. It is from 2019. Probably close to 260 million right now — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruderhymer (talk • contribs) 15:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Oricon doesn't include Digital sales. Shueisha is more reliable

Also if you remember Oricon announced Demon Slayer best selling manga of 2019 but then Shueisha said no it is One Piece. You can check out both news so I added Mangaplus/Shueisha source back

Oricon's list: https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2019-11-27/top-selling-manga-in-japan-by-series-2019/.153758

Shueisha's correction: https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2019-11-24/demon-slayer-is-shueisha-2nd-highest-selling-manga-after-one-piece-in-2019/.153643 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruderhymer (talk • contribs) 14:48, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Red-Haired Shanks

Thank you for your contributions. There is another user who believes the Shanks page needs to be a sandbox draft before being made into a page, so I pinged you at the relevant discussion. I am also editing a page on Franky; feel free to edit my sandbox to improve that page as well! --Plumber (talk) 23:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Oh, and I also just submitted as Proposal for restructuring the List of One Piece characters page. Check it out Selenne! --Plumber (talk) 02:13, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, more news here. The same user proposed the Shanks article is an article for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Red-Haired_Shanks. Feel free to make your opinion known. --Plumber (talk) 20:43, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

I had seen their reasonings about the deletion of Shanks page. Mostly of them saying the page must have a secondary or third party sources and not all be primary sources. Tintor2 had mentioned that Shanks do not have many articles or reviews compare to the Strawhats since you already knew Shanks had appeared rarely in the Series.

My suggestion is that we must put Shanks article in Sandbox first. Maybe later this year, when Shanks will have many scenes in the manga or When Film Red will aired this year, many reviews or articles about him will definitely appeared. And then, we can use that sources in a new Shanks Wikipedian page. Selenne (talk) 21:07, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

I'd like to point out that this editor Yujoong reverted an edit where I removed unsourced info from that article, and left "Do not undo this again" as part of their edit summary. Fred Zepelin (talk) 22:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Hello, I'm Panda619. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of best-selling manga without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Wikipedia doesn't rely on WP:RSPRIMARY sources, we don't need wait for any official announcement. Panda619 (talk) 12:23, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

The problem with the article or the source that you gave is the "CBR" is not a reliable source. It says the source is "Toei Animation" but i cannot found an article of Toei Animation saying that One Piece had 500 million circulation.

Another, the most reliable secondary sources like ORICON, Yahoo, Anime News Network, Mantan Web, Natali.mu, and so on had not gave any article saying that One Piece had 500 million copies circulation. Show me other secondary sources saying OP had 500M circulation then i will believe that CBR article that you gave. Selenne (talk) 11:11, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

I don't know how CBR is not RS. Panda619 (talk) 11:58, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

It is not a reliable source from what i knew. I remember that i used it before as source in a wikipedia page Wikipedian users deleted it saying that is not a reliable source or not a good source. Also, from what i read on their articles before, they always gave false information. Thats why i also do not trust CBR website. If you cannot found another secondary sources beside CBR then i will undo your edit. Selenne (talk) 05:38, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

And CBR was right and so is Siliconera, you keep assuming these are non reliable source for no reason, Siliconera is an established news site, its is part of Enthusiast Gaming and Destructoid and they have strong editorial journalists and 1000s Wikipedia articles use this site as reference, please stop assuming that every site that is not in Top 10 News site lists as non reliable and Both Box office mojo and The Numbers are very reliable when it comes to films made by US production, everything else, they suck, they don't track all the regions and won't track the full of run of many regions and months and years late they will update numbers for some NON-US FILMS, they are very inconsistent when it comes to NON-US films, you can go around seeing box office reference of many anime films and non-US films, you will often find other better sources linked for Worldwide box office with WP:CALC and they may also have citations of BOM and The Numbers, but their figures won't be fully updated, so only used as supporting source. Panda619 (talk) 14:30, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited One Piece Film: Red, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)