• archives 12

Files deleted edit

Hi. I see you transcluded Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion in this image and a few others and have taken this as an author request for deletion. Thus I deleted them under WP:G7, I hope this was your intention. Cheers, Cenarium (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

View edit

Is there a way to check how many times an article has been viewed by anyone ?

Yes. User:Henrik's brand new en.wikipedia.org article traffic statistics program I hope this helps. --ROGER DAVIES talk
Thanks for the link

WikiProject Sri Lanka edit

  Hello! Yucatann, I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject Sri Lanka. We work on creating, expanding and making general changes to Sri Lanka related articles. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Members Page! Thank You. Blackknight12 (talk) 00:57, 5 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of civilian massacres attributed to Sri Lankan government forces for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of civilian massacres attributed to Sri Lankan government forces is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of civilian massacres attributed to Sri Lankan government forces until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LahiruG talk 08:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nedunkerny edit

 

The article Nedunkerny has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PLACEOUTCOMES, requires significant coverage (about the town) in multiple independent secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 13:46, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Puliyankulam edit

 

The article Puliyankulam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PLACEOUTCOMES, requires significant in multiple independent secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 18:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nedunkerny for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nedunkerny is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nedunkerny until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dan arndt (talk) 14:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply