December 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Pepper. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Nicotina— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. "Pepper" @ 02:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daijingūshita Station with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. "Pepper" @ 02:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hernán Bolaños with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. "Pepper" @ 02:32, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at San Diego Comic-Con International, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: San Diego Comic-Con International was changed by Youtubephangirl111 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913062 on 2014-12-09T02:36:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:36, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dil howlter edit

 

The article Dil howlter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable fictional character, no reliable source coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Everymorning talk 23:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dil howlter for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dil howlter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dil howlter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 00:27, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply