YoungLink9

March 2016

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Allan Quatermain— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:08, 17 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Soupenstein with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 14:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

YoungLink9, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi YoungLink9! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Soupenstein (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic