August 2011

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Foreign policy of the United States, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Foreign policy of the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~Red Rover (Talk to me!) contribs 10:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism‎. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. I might add that you are not helping your case by repeatedly removing your name from the report. Yunshui (talk) 10:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:24, 25 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

You know I am saying truth (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

New to wikipedia. Got frustrated by seeing no criticism against USA who are doing so much damage to humanity. So I thought I would contribute to the page. You know I am saying truth (talk) 10:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This is an encyclopedia of knowledge that is supported by third party reliabel sources, and not one that allows original research or even the WP:TRUTH. All articles/commentary must follow the neutral point of view. You're not allowed to include personal critique - and of course, based on the long term fiscal issues in the US, your critique is flawed anyway. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:52, 25 August 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.