October 2012 edit

  Hello, I'm Boing! said Zebedee. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Hagen Troy seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please only add objective neutral material (see WP:NPOV) sourced to reliable sources (see WP:RS) to Wikipedia articles - if you want to write about how wonderful he is, please do so elsewhere -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:10, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

June 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hagen Troy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:06, 19 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

July 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hagen Troy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:02, 27 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Possible conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Yingjie.huang. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Hagen Troy, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:24, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hagen Troy edit

 

The article Hagen Troy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

shameless (self?)-promotion by two (or perhaps just one?) closely-connected single-purpose account(s); it's hard to tell through all the Chinese text, but appears completely to fail WP:NM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:26, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Warning: conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Yingjie.huang. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Please do not add unreferenced material to Hagen Troy again, and think very carefully before editing the article in any way. Editing articles where you have a conflict of interest can lead to your account being blocked. You can request edits to the article by posting at Talk:Hagen Troy. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:52, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Just to let you know ... edit

... that I have opened a sockpuppet investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Taylor.monki and that you are mentioned there. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit