YassinRi
Hello, I'm IronManCap. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. IronManCap (talk) 23:06, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
April 2024
edit
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Safi, Morocco. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 17:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 18:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
YassinRi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am writing to appeal the block on my account mistakenly identified as a sockpuppet of Yassine181 i assure you i have no connection with this user and my contributions always referenced or translated from another language of wikipedia of the same article and reflect my commitment to the community's standards please review my case and consider reinstating my account i am ready to comply with any required verification processes. YassinRi (talk) 19:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The coincidences seem too great for a simple denial to be sufficient here. Even if there's no relation, there's been significant problems with your editing. Yamla (talk) 19:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
YassinRi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am writing to address the concerns regarding my Wikipedia account being potentially linked to another account, "Yassine181." I understand the severity of the accusations and appreciate the need for maintaining the integrity of the Wikipedia community. However, after a detailed review of both accounts' activities, significant differences underscore that these accounts are operated by different individuals: ;Focus and Content of Edits: :* "Yassine181": Primarily engages in highly contentious editing regarding political and ethnic identity issues within the Maghreb region. The edits are often emotionally charged and involve substantial reverts and deletions, reflecting a particular stance on the Arab-Berber identity conflict. :* "YassinRi": Focuses on well-sourced contributions and translations relating to local Moroccan geography and culture, such as the updates on Safi, Morocco, and contributions to articles about local historical figures and sites. These contributions are informational and intended to enrich the content with verifiable sources and translations from French Wikipedia. ;Editing Style and Behavior: :* "Yassine181": Has been involved in edit wars, as evident from consecutive reverts and emotionally driven content in edit summaries, suggesting a personal or emotional investment in the topics. :* "YassinRi": Consistently adds sourced information and engages in constructive edits. Even when mistakes were made in the past, recent edits have been responsible and aimed at improving article quality. ;Account Age and History: :* My account, "YassinRi," is older than "Yassine181," which is relevant not only in terms of longevity but also the evolution of editing behavior over time, showing a learning curve and adaptation to Wikipedia’s standards. ;Admission of Past Errors: :* I acknowledge that earlier in my editing history, I may have made errors, but I have taken conscientious steps to ensure all my recent contributions are constructive, sourced, and align with community guidelines. In light of the above points, the evidence strongly indicates that these accounts are operated independently, with distinct focuses, styles, and behaviors. My contributions have been made in good faith, with a clear record of improvement and adherence to Wikipedia's editing standards. I kindly request a re-evaluation of the block in consideration of these clarifications. I am committed to transparency and am willing to engage in any verification process required to confirm my identity as distinct from "Yassine181." Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Note from blocking admin: See the intertwined contribution history of these two accounts. While YassinRi' does seem less provocative and confrontational than Yassine181, I would differ with him on how his editing "show[s] a learning curve and adaptation to Wikipedia's standards", since after making a few edits shortly following the account's creation three years ago, YassinRi made no edits whatsoever until after Yassine181 was blocked indefinitely. It could just as easily be inferred that the editor decided to create the second account to right a great wrong, in the hope that if that didn't work out they could go back to using the original account without anyone being the wiser. Sometimes that has worked; I don't think this is one of those times.
Now, if YassinRi were to admit they created and edited with both accounts, I might be amenable to letting them continue to edit with this' one (and only this one) as long as they disclosed it on their userpage (as well as any other accounts they may have created even if they were never used) and were willing to edit in conformity with Wikipedia policies from then on. (I would also like to hear what @Skitash: thinks, since it was their AIV report that led to this block). Daniel Case (talk) 17:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Reply to the note of the blocking admin @Daniel Case:: Thank you for addressing my previous message. I must clarify, I only operate this one Wikipedia account which is YassinRi. The differences between my contributions and those of "Yassine181" are clear: I focus on diversified topics with well-sourced information or translations, contrasting sharply with the single-issue, often biased edits from "Yassine181."
- I value honesty and integrity above all, and while I deeply appreciate the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia, I cannot admit to actions that are not true, even if it would mean regaining my editing privileges. If my account remains blocked under these circumstances, I accept this outcome, as I stand by the truth and the principles that define this community.
- I completely agree with you. I find it peculiar that this user has seemingly come back to editing shortly after Yassine181 had been blocked indefinitely. Could it be that YassinRi created Yassine181 as a single purpose account to pursue certain controversial tasks through disruptive means? The actions of both accounts bear a striking resemblance, particularly in their evident ethnic POV and tendency to add unsourced WP:OR to articles pertaining to Morocco, as evidenced by YassinRi's undiscussed page move and persistent addition of unsourced content.[1][2][3][4] I'm open to the idea of unblocking the user provided they disclosed their sockpuppets, set aside their POV and refrained from adding unsourced content. Skitash (talk) 20:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Rym Fikri
edit Hello, YassinRi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rym Fikri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Rym Fikri
edit
Hello, YassinRi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rym Fikri".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)