User talk:Yamamoto Ichiro/Archives/2

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Thanks

Thanks for the heads up, I do respect Wiki like none other. I use it everyday. But things like I just saw... Dont get me too happy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.217.134.140 (talk • contribs) .

Thank you

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. - Akamad 07:27, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the same thing. Appreciate it. __earth ^(Talk) 08:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

I also appreciate it very much! Pacdude 05:27, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, thanks.

Wait, is this an automated message, or are you actually sending me it? Because if it's automated, it's quite a bit late.

Are you an anime fan, by any chance? —the preceding unsigned comment is by PsychoJosh (talk • contribs)

Unsigned Comment

It's my first day here with an account and I'm overwhelmed. So I must thank you for taking the vandalism off of my user page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Holocron (talk • contribs)

User: CURPS YOU GODAMNED FUCKING FUCK BOT!

Seems to have somehow escaped from your ban. Noticed it while doing recent changes patrol. Makemi 22:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

All I did is add {{indefblockeduser}} template to his talk page. Uh, users that were blocked are still able to edit their own user and talk page. They are blocked to edit anything other than that. --Ichiro 22:07, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Unsigned Comment

Hello!! You are japanese, well!!! Do you know Gerard Depardieu the french actor??? Wikipedia in english or in german?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.185.108.104 (talk • contribs)

Sorry, no idea what your talking about.--Ichiro 22:10, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, and query.

Sorry about that vandalism, that was my irritating little brother who got on my account and vandalised some stuff.

Recently, I created an article called "Destructive revolution" about the band I am in. I wrote a long and informative piece, which took me a long while to write. However a week a so later I see that it no longer exists. Why?

Regards, Mark —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark simpsonsfan (talk • contribs)

Talk: Anna Vissi

I did not remove anything. All I did was add pictures and edit something under the discution area. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.82.68 (talk • contribs)

This leave message?

test —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.94.109.68 (talk • contribs)

About user Downjam

Hi there Ichiru,

Please don't worry about user Downjam editing my page. I know him and he is just experimenting with my page. I will direct him to the sandbox from now on for his experiments.

Regards,

Alphgeek

Your bot

Appears to be everywhere. Nice work! El_C 03:51, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aladin - sockpuppet check

Hi Ichiro, I just saw that you closed the voting for Aladin with a "keep" resolution. I have asked that the closer will perform a sockpuppet check on the vote. Have you done such a thing and what was the outcome? Peter S. 01:15, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Just wanted to thank you very much for your diligent removal of vandalism from my user page. Sorry this comes late, as I only just now noticed. Cookie? :) -- Hinotori^{(talk)|(ctrb)} 11:02, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

thanks

Thanks for cleaning that vandalism off my user page! --Ixfd64 17:22, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Popup-assisted-reversion

What is it? Can I get it?--TheDoctor10 (talk|email) 18:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks very much.--TheDoctor10 (talk|email) 11:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

and u are?

its not like anything is saved on here anyway, is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.180.134.38 (talk • contribs)

{{oldvfdfull2}} should be replaced with {{oldafdfull}}

You're doing a great job closing all those AFDs. However You might find it helpful to use {{oldafdfull}} instead of {{oldvfdfull2}}: the former has the "Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion/" coded into it, making it more difficult to mis-type something. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 09:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Velvet_Cacoon

I question that the result of the debate was "Keep". I left a message on Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Velvet_Cacoon. Could you respond to that? Thanks. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-13 01:45Z

I have changed the result from keep to no consensus, which would default to keep anyways. But thanks for pointing that out. --Ichiro 05:20, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-13 07:13Z

Relisting AfDs

I'm a little confused as to why you are "relisting" AfDs. They are supposed to run a set period of time, and then the closing admin makes a determination based on the discussion of what action to take. Typically, "no consensus == no action == keep." I can understand relisting AfDs with a very low turnout (although we already have a bot that does just that), but I can't understand why you are relisting pages such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of firearms in first-person shooters. Turnstep 01:48, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

For the record then, I think this is a very poor idea. At the very least, please let people know your criteria for "relisting". I've seen many AfDs closed by admins in which the AfDs had far fewer people contributing than some of the ones you've had relisted. Before relisting any more AfDs, I'd respectfully ask you to talk about this on the talk page for AfD. Thanks. Turnstep 14:09, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Sounds good, thanks for the response. Turnstep 15:41, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

I agree with Turnstep. In particular, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boarhouse, which you relisted despite having four votes to delete and no votes to keep. Please take your time when closing AfDs. Thanks! Stifle 01:53, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

My user page

Did you insert text into my user page as opposed to my talk page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GreatGatsby (talk • contribs) .

Apologies, I was trying to figure out who it was who actually added a question at the end of one my paragraphs, but Wikipedia was being weird and showed you as said person. GreatGatsby 22:08, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Unsigned Comment

kthx —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.149.144.133 (talk • contribs) .

Sockpuppet ?

Hello. Just to let you know I suspect that User:Juicedpalmeiro may be a sockpuppet of User:Brian Brockmeyer, User:Flavius Aetius, User:Almeidaisgod. No Guru 17:14, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the reply. No Guru 18:49, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Michael Sean Coulthard

Could you protect this page from vandalism? It's getting annoying reverting the vandalism from those anon users. — Moe ε 03:21, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page! - CHAIRBOY (☎) 04:19, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks also for reverting vandalism on my talk page! DaGizza^{Chat (c)} 19:49, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Unsigned Comment

sOORY —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.198.43.129 (talk • contribs) .

Unsigned Comment

those messages about khuzestan are totally wrong —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.196.184.184 (talk • contribs) .

khuzistan

Happens to be my favourite Iranian province. But anyways, cheers for the revert. I appreciate it. Slac speak up! 02:45, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia being used for stock scam by ncans.net

Ichiro, That is exactly what I have been trying to get across to those from www.ncans.net who created the phoney 'naked short selling' site or subject on Wikipedia to begin with.It is no doubt true that had I not made a point to correct or dispute the contents Wikipedia might be criticised unfairly for a scam penny stock promotion using your very own encyclopedia for credibility.Glad you dislike it as much as I do.

If you or someone you know has knowledge of stocks then you might be able to follow this debate,or scam as I know it to be,and write the story yourself.I do not deny the existence of 'naked shorting'only that it is being used in this case to cover up and excuse illegal penny stock 'pump and dump' fraud the SEC does nothing about.Also no Blue Chip stock complains about it,only penny stocks or poorly managed ccompanies whose main income is from selling their worthless shares on the market.So while I don't deny 'naked shorting'it is not a great problem and does not destroy real companies.Has Toyota ever complained about being 'naked shorted' ? Has Sony ? Has MicroSoft or Apple ? I didn't think so.

I am asking you and Wikipedia to delete the naked short site altogether or study the issue yourselves.But please,if you allow it to remain,allow me to warn others about the half truths at best on the Wikipedia 'naked shorting' space or just get rid of it.I was defrauded of a lot of money in that scam.Where or how can I post my dissent if Wikipedia deletes it and allows only the fraudsters their say ?

Below is a link to the creators of the 'naked shorting' subject on Wikipedia,www.ncans.net.You may not have the experience to know a scam penny stock promotion website when you see one however the link below is a scam penny stock website and you can see from quotes below they know who I am and resent me for interfering with the extension of the 'naked short selling' scam they added to Wikipedia to lend credibility to their faud.

I am glad to answer any questions at : endoscam@lycos.com.Also my writing on this fraud is all over indymedia.org sites.Do a google search of 'endoscam'.I posted a number of those links to the 'naked shorting' subject space but Wikipedia or the crooks of ncans.net had them removed.Please do not allow the ncans.net crew to use Wikipedia for their supposed 'anti-nakled short selling'scam.You may note I did the controversial James Dale Davidson Wikipedia site, still unfinished.If Mr.Davidson has not complained or offered some reason to change it that's because my documentation of his scam is very detailed.I have my 2004 email correspondence with Davidson but I'd sure like to interview him if he ever complains.Yes it should be written in a more encyclopedic style but his penny stock scams that I and stocklemon.com and our-street.com discuss are all true and he is a Washington D.C. insider.

Also you might contact Mysid IN REGARDS TO THIS DEBATE AND HE MIGHT BE ABLE TO TELL YOU A LITTLE BIT ABOUT ME.

Sincerely Tony Ryals

From ncans.net :

http://www.thesanitycheck.com/BobsSanityCheckBlog/tabid/56/EntryID/24/Default.aspx#Comments

Re: Of Feces, Whirling Blades, and Unbridled Greed and Corruption... By dave on 1/17/2006 8:44 AM The blog writers should make sure they also put links, info on this page as a lot of newspaper and magazine writers will refer to Wikipedia for background on a story.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_short

.

---

Re: Of Feces, Whirling Blades, and Unbridled Greed and Corruption... By bobo on 1/17/2006 10:16 AM Dave

The wikepedia link didn't come through all the way.

---

Re: Of Feces, Whirling Blades, and Unbridled Greed and Corruption... By mfairview on 1/17/2006 12:21 PM Looks like wikipedia got Ryal-ized. What a wacko this character is. Patchie, you might have a libel case against his recent statement: "David Patch is a known securities fraud who promotes the sleeziest of sleazy penny stocks not only through Gayle Essary's scammy Financialwire and investigatethesec.com websites but using Lycos ragingbull.com to bring in more suckers to defraud with penny stocks that run pump and dump activities and then as share price collapses as more shares are dumped cry 'naked shorting' and the SEC looks the other way."

Unsigned

huh —The preceding unsigned comment was added by L0deiscool (talk • contribs) .

I disagree with your vandalism claim.

My "vandalism" was not a mistake. I do not believe that removing Ayn Rand from the LGBT rights opposition category was vandalism, inasmuch as Ayn Rand did NOT oppose such rights. My editing was a good-faith (and I believe correct) attempt to improve Wikipedia.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.7.212.152 (talk • contribs) .

Were you referring to this edit[1]? I was referring to that edit, and it's probably made by mistake, so don't worry about it. - Ichiro 06:11, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Good work!

Just here to congratulate you on your sagacious removal of vandalism from countless pages. You're a credit to the 'pedia :-) The magical Spum-dandy 11:05, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Reverting vandalism of my page

Thanks for reverting the double vandalism of my user page. I appreciate your help and watchful eye. Have a nice day and thanks for your hard work! Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 13:50, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Math Is Fun

I, VegaDark, hereby award Yamamoto Ichiro The Barnstar of Reversion for beating me on reversions 3 times in a row — 19:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Hello. Please allow me to give a bit of advice. You closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Math Is Fun before the standard seven days because the nominator withdrew his nomination. However, it is my understanding that this is only allowed if the nomination did not attract any delete "votes"; this is backed up by Wikipedia:Speedy keep.

In this particular case, the article was clearly going to be kept, so no harm is done and I think we should keep the AfD page closed. But I think you shouldn't do so again. Cheers, Jitse Niesen (talk) 14:11, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

whats the big deal

nobody in our school cares about this site, they will see it and laugh, I see no harm in it, pull the stick out of your ass and have sence of humor—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.253.182.127 (talk • contribs) .

Vandalism tools

I copy and pasted that text into that page and created it, but nothing seemed to change when I pressed control+F5, and yes I am using Internet Explorer. Did I do something wrong? VegaDark 06:07, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Nevermind, I was looking in the wrong place for the rollback button, I see it now. Thanks for the tip VegaDark 06:10, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, while the rollback button is there, clicking it doesn't seem to work. It goes to a page where it says "Please wait, reverting edits by (Insert user here)... Getting article history (article history here)..." and does nothing after that. It doesn't actually revert anything, and I have waited for a good 45 seconds which should be much more time than it should take to do anything (I'm using cable). On the IE status bar it says "Error", which I am assuming has something to do with it. Any suggestions? VegaDark 06:44, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Reverting vandalism

How did you get the "admin rollback summary"? (Reverted edits by X to last version of Y) Special:Listusers doesn't say that you are an admin. Did you use some kind of programming code? -- King of Hearts | (talk) 01:54, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

• I tried the script, it doesn't work. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 22:50, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

learn to read

have a look at the Mary j blige page. you've just reverted back to vandalism. for god sakes. use your brain 218.101.64.109

Let's try to relax, nontheless. El_C 03:00, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

and why don't you just but out of people's conversations. 218.101.64.109

As a Wikipedia administrator, I'm making it my conversation, too! (how special of me, I know!) :) El_C 03:05, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

you've done it again

have a look at the Mary j blige page. you've just reverted back to vandalism. for god sakes. use your brain 218.101.64.109

Let's try to relax, nontheless. El_C 03:00, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Hey, I don't recall repeating myself. Sweet. El_C 03:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Oops, I guess I wasn't paying attention and thought previous comments were blanked lol. Sorry. --Ichiro 03:08, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

this is what you've just reverted back: "Wuz Mary it's me i wish u could change some of the bad things that happened in your life. I have read in a magazine what had happened 2 u an I was sorry to hear that. U know when u was talking about your temper problem u are not the only one b/cause i'm like that some time 2. well my wordz are fallen short so I will Holla At U Lata."

can't be bothered to change it back when someone clearly doesn't read it probably. meh. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 218.101.64.109 (talk • contribs) .

thanks from me

Thanks for reverting my user talk. However, it just doesn't seem like vandalism if they don't go after your actual user page. Who goes after a talk page? That's just sad. Anyway, thanks again. - BanyanTree 04:57, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Transportation in NYC

Hello Yamamoto - I notice you've done work on the New York City article. The Transportation in New York City sub article is really come along and has been nominated to be a US Collaboration of the Week. Check it out and if you like it, please vote for it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:USCOTW We need all the votes we can get! Wv235 03:46, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism...

I've just reverted the conservatism page due to vandalism from 25.70.95.203. I'm a wikipedia novice so I'm not sure who to report it to, but you were the person who had given them a final warning. I hope I haven't bothered you by sending you this message incorrectly.

24.83.101.207

My user and message pages say they have messages from you, but my history pages say they were added by 24.83.101.207. He's taking your ID to vandalize my pages. 68.85.185.223 01:00, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Unsigned Comment

Go! away! My affairs are not yours. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thistheman (talk • contribs) .

Thanks for the heads up

Thanks for the notice - I missed the box for the edit summary, I was totally new to editing a Wiki page but the page in question had been maliciously altered so the end of some paragraphs were sarcastic jokes about the person in question - my moral duty took over and I removed them.

However, thanks for pointing out that I should have left a reason, I will do so in the future.

All the best,

Pat —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.9.191.4 (talk • contribs) .

Re: Illmatic article

I am not vandalizing, but something is wrong with the article and I thought that it was somehow due to the recent edits I made earlier....as the article continues, the font becomes smaller and smaller, to the point of becoming unreadable. It may very well be something wrong with my computer... --24.63.72.100 22:22, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for repairing the article --24.63.72.100 22:32, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

shez_15

I just had to tell you that person is adding nomination lists to actor's pages. this is an encyclopedia and i feel it should not be projected as a fansite. Please tell your employee not to destroy the ambiance of wikipedia. he/she is also adding irrelevant photos on actor's pages. please supervise him/her whoever it is. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shez 15 (talk • contribs) .

Mortal Kombat Comic Books.

I'M SORRY BUT U HAVE A LOT OF WRONG INFORMATION I THINK U SHOULD DO THE PAGE OVER AGAIN AND READ THE MK COMIC BOOKS IF U HAVE 2 TO COUSE I'M A BIG FAN AND READ ALL THE COMIC BOOKS SO I SHOULD KNOW WHEN SOMEONE IS LAYING I COULD SAY U NEVER READ ONE OF THE COMICS COUSE IF U HAD U WOULD HAVE KNOW THAT SUB-ZERO THE ELDER WAS THERE AND THE YOUNGER ALSO MADE HIS APERREANCE IN THE SAME COMIC BOOK AFTER SUB-ZERO WAS KILLED BY SCORPION.THANK U FOR YOUR TIME —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.194.56.237 (talk • contribs) .

Thank you for user page revert

I appreciate the user page revert of User:That_Guy,_From_That_Show!/Links. I was off watching for vandalism and didn't notice vandalism of my user space. -- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 07:47, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

• Same here. VegaDark 23:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for that...I was testing to see if it was working, cause the first time i tried to correct a small change nothing happened...i will try to use the sandbox thing next time.

how do u know if the information submitted or edited is authentic —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 60.228.75.31 (talk • contribs) .

Sorry about not puting the welcome on his talk page. It was my first time trying that out.--Holocron 12:56, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

thank you--Holocron 15:24, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

User page

Wow you are a great vandal fighter if the vandals hate you that much. :) I have semi protected your page from vandalism. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 00:17, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Wow, thanks! Ichiro (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) 00:18, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. Just ask me when to unprotect. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 00:19, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

for reverting the vandalism of my user page. :) --Golbez 00:45, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

thanks for your vote on my rfa

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adam1213 (talk • contribs) .

Removal of material because you don't agree is WRONG

Your removal of meaningful material from the Judge Alito page was bias and politically motivated. Please keep your opinions and feelings about abortion, civil rights, and the theory of a unitary president OUT of Wikipedia.

Politics and personal beliefs have no place in this community.

The truth should be know, even if Republicans try to remove it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stigys (talk • contribs) .

I have no idea what your talking about. This is the only edit I made to that page. --Ichiro (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) 02:08, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Sprotect

Could you semi-protect User talk:68.74.185.144 as there is an edit war causing 3RR violations. — Moe ε 04:57, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism by User:141.43.210.4

Hi, thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page. I have put successive warnings on User talk:141.43.210.4, let's see what happens now... Schutz 16:03, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Unsigned Comment

never mind —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.234.36.74 (talk • contribs) .

209.5.63.199 engaging in vandalism

This user repeatedly vandalises the Red Tory article, and judging by their Edit History is a political partisan with an agenda. TrulyTory 22:32, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

==Template:Canadian federal election, 2006==

I have started a poll on using full party names or short forms on this template. Please vote at Talk:Canadian federal election, 2006. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 23:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.