Yall are smart

first

May 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:50, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Yall are smart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Yall are smart (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

ight so i understand it now. also there was literally nothing about a username policy when i signed up but whatever. i dont feel this block is necessary cause as i said i understand. yeah thats it. EDIT: per 331dot's concerns below: i changed my request from "Yall are smart asf" to "Yall are smart". this my profile, complain at me and my work HERE 07:00, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Accept reason:

globally renamed to Yall are smart --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 14:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

While your new choice is no longer a personal attack, it still references a vulgar word. 331dot (talk) 07:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

globally renamed Yall are dumb asf to Yall are smart

globally renamed Yall are dumb asf to Yall are smart Just waiting on the queue --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 14:00, 1 May 2020 (UTC)  Done

thank you so god damn much -this my profile, complain at me and my work HERE 19:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Nixinova (talk) 08:32, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

@Nixinova: your welcome —this my profile, complain at me and my work HERE 08:44, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yall are smart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

theres a whole ass rule for no personal attacks? i didnt know that. and anyways, the block isnt necessary anymore because i get it now. also i saw some dude complained about me on your talk page. i replied to them and you straight up removed my reply for no reason. thats against one of the rules i swear. but yeah anyways, they gave some examples for when i "personally attacked" people and most of them were invalid because i wasn't even talking to anyone specifically in my edit summaries. also how tf is this or this a personal attack? whatever. the only time i really personally attacked someone would prolly be this and this. anyways, as i said i don't think this is necessary cause i understand that this is a rule now, and i wont do any "personal attacks". that dsq kid complaining about my personal attacks when he didnt even read the page; the article clearly says that you can complain about content and not people. isnt that what i did here and here? also bro you cant be removing my shit like that. at least say if i did something wrong fr. it literally says in my signature. you removed my barnstar and removed my question for why you removed it. you removed my reply to dsq instead of replying to me and saying if there's something wrong. you have no right to be an admin if you act like that. —this my profile, complain at me and my work HERE 22:43, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 22:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ummm I'm not a "dude", a "he" or a "kid". Just saying. Bye now. DSQ (talk) 23:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yall are smart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

jpgordon can you elaborate? and how is that abusive? —this my profile, complain at me and my work HERE 00:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.