Welcome!

edit

Hi, XfDWatcher. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 03:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Indeed, welcome

edit

And as a suggestion, you might like to disclose any previous accounts you have held here. Many thanks — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 09:06, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

March 2017

edit

  You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/William Pina. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 23:48, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Prohibited purposes includes making Project Space edits when you have another account that is your main account. You are obviously an experienced Wikipedian. What is your history of Wikipedia accounts? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

CSD denied

edit

Could you clarify why you tagged Reactions to Executive Order 13769 as an attack page? -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

March 2017

edit

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Reactions to Executive Order 13769.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Look at its content; don't decline it. If you scroll down carefully, you can see it has profane content (e.g. it contains the "BS" word). I would consider it too libelous/legally threatening for an encyclopedia, even if Wikipedia is not censored. If any admin thinks it is not eligible for deletion, I still consider it an attack page. XfDWatcher (talk) 20:54, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Several admins (at least 2 because i was about .01 of a second behind undoing the tag myself) don't agree with your take on this (or several other pages) you've advised are attack pages. It might be worth reading the section on attack pages before nominating any more like this. Amortias (T)(C) 20:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Speedy deletion was declined, since it is not an attack page, but a discussion of a notable event in US politics. Unreferenced statements can be tagged as such. Edits can be made within the limits of the sanctions described on the talk page. Nonnotable or inappropriate articles can be nominated for deletion at AFD or for merger. Edison (talk) 21:01, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
You also need to read about libel and legal threats. For something to be libelous something negative must be said about a specific person. For something to be a legal threat, someone needs to make a threat that they are going to take legal action against Wikipedia or editors. This page does neither. - GB fan 21:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

DS warning

edit
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

~ Rob13Talk 04:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply