Xenarc

October 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Usage

{{unblock-spamun | jmsilva33308 | Reason Xenarc Technologies is not paying anything to add their name to the list of LCD Monitor Manufacturers. I just thought that adding Xenarc to the list of manufacturers was ACTUALLY A POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION TO THE PAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I MEAN THAT PAGE IS DOMINATED BY CHINESE MANUFACTURERS BUT NOT AMERICAN ONES AND WE DO HAVE AMERICAN LCD MANUFACTURES. XENARC TECHNOLOGIES HAS BEEN IN EXISTANCE FOR OVER 20 YEARS. SEE OUR ABOUT US PAGE. THE GUY REVIEWING MY EDITS AND THE GUY THAT BLOCKED ME DID NOT EVEN BOTHER TO SEE WHAT PAGE I WAS ADDING. YOU GOT TO PUT PEOPLE THAT ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT IS A POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION OR SPAM. XENARC TECHNOLOGIES MEETS THE LCD MANUFACTURER LABEL THE LAST 20 YEARS SO WIKIPEDIA SHOULD HAVE A CITATION FOR IT> IT IS INCOMPLETE. I AM THE ONLY ONE USING THIS ACCOUNT NOT The WHOLE ORGANIZATION AND I HAVE NOT POSTED ANY SPAMMY ADVERTISMENTS ANYWHERE! PELASE UNBLOCK ME}}

Why do I need to do all this madness just to get unblocked. Wikipedia really is losing valuable information missing from its pages because of people like you. CAPITAL LETTERS ARE RUDE???? WOW.. .ARE YOU THE PRESIDENT OF WIKIPEDIA?? EMOTIONS PLAY A PART HERE?????? WHAT MADNESS?@!!!!!!! YOU PEOPLE ARE GIVEN TOO MUCH POWER TO JUST BAN ANYONE IT IS RIDICULOUS>

Notes

• This template adds userpages into the cats Requests for unblock and Requests for username changes when blocked.

See also

• {{unblock}}

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Xenarc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

jmsilva33308 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Reason Xenarc Technologies is not paying anything to add their name to the list of LCD Monitor Manufacturers. I just thought that adding Xenarc to the list of manufacturers was ACTUALLY A POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION TO THE PAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I MEAN THAT PAGE IS DOMINATED BY CHINESE MANUFACTURERS BUT NOT AMERICAN ONES AND WE DO HAVE AMERICAN LCD MANUFACTURES. XENARC TECHNOLOGIES HAS BEEN IN EXISTANCE FOR OVER 20 YEARS. SEE OUR ABOUT US PAGE. THE GUY REVIEWING MY EDITS AND THE GUY THAT BLOCKED ME DID NOT EVEN BOTHER TO SEE WHAT PAGE I WAS ADDING. YOU GOT TO PUT PEOPLE THAT ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT IS A POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION OR SPAM. XENARC TECHNOLOGIES MEETS THE LCD MANUFACTURER LABEL THE LAST 20 YEARS SO WIKIPEDIA SHOULD HAVE A CITATION FOR IT> IT IS INCOMPLETE. I AM THE ONLY ONE USING THIS ACCOUNT NOT The WHOLE ORGANIZATION AND I HAVE NOT POSTED ANY SPAMMY ADVERTISMENTS ANYWHERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PELASE UNBLOCK ME

Decline reason:

PLEASE STOP SHOUTING. You have not addressed your clear violations of WP:COI, nor have you told us how your edits would be different if we unblocked you. Yamla (talk) 17:08, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

No one is shouting. ITS JUST FRUSTRATING THAT PEOPLE BLOCKING ME DON'T EVEN DO THEIR HOMEWORK

Using capital letters is considered shouting and is rude. Please stop doing so. WP:GAB will help you understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 17:18, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Why do I need to do all this madness just to get unblocked. Wikipedia really is losing valuable information missing from its pages because of people like you. CAPITAL LETTERS ARE RUDE???? WOW.. .ARE YOU THE PRESIDENT OF WIKIPEDIA?? EMOTIONS PLAY A PART HERE?????? WHAT MADNESS?@!!!!!!! YOU PEOPLE ARE GIVEN TOO MUCH POWER TO JUST BAN ANYONE IT IS RIDICULOUS>

You were warned. Talk page access revoked. This leaves you with WP:UTRS. I strongly suggest you read WP:GAB and WP:COI before making a request there. --Yamla (talk) 17:23, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Xenarc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #27306 was submitted on Oct 25, 2019 17:37:18. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:37, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

1. Existence is not enough to warrant mention on Wikipedia. A company must be notable to be considered worthy of inclusion. Lack of a standalone article is reason enough to exclude it from any list.
2. We consider evidence from reliable sources that are independent of the company to judge if it is worthy of inclusion.
3. Wikipedia is not interested in what a company's representatives want to say about it. Readers expect neutral articles, written independently of their subject and sourced reliably, not corporate promotional pieces.
4. Your account name violates Wikipedia's username policy, which disallows accounts from being named after companies or organizations. Accounts are meant to be accessed by and represent a single individual.
5. Even if your company meets the notability criteria, you are discouraged from writing about it due to the inherent conflict of interest it presents. You would also have to abide by the mandatory paid editing disclosure policy.
6. If an article about this company is ever accepted, at no time will you or anyone else have ownership or exclusive control over its contents. Articles are editable by anyone, and can change substantially over time. Consensus is Wikipedia's fundamental editorial model.
7. Editors are expected to behave civilly and engage in calm, rational discussion. Emotional outbursts (like the above lashing out in anger) is disruptive and can lead to sanctions.

--Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:24, 25 October 2019 (UTC)